Forum:Madolche Tea Break

Does Madolche Tea Breaks secondary effect (destroy a card in puddingcess is present) effect follow the same rules as Magical Dimension. more specifically, the "Stardust/Prime material Dragon cannot stop" part im fairly certain it does, but would like confirmation. DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 04:11, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

It wouldn't matter for either Stardust/Prime Material Dragon, as their effects cannot be Chained to a Counter Trap Card. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:28, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

... wow the hell did i forget THAT detail well now i feel really stupid, srsly completely forgot the absolute basics of spell speeds ok, would Destruction Jammer be able to stop it then DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 05:39, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

No, it won't. MadRest 20:10, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

Master D, I (and most likely other users) would like to see the basis for your reasoning. I researched it and found you were correct, but still, it would make this place seem a little more official. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 22:55, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

Destruction Jammer only works if it is certain that the card will destroy a monster. Madolche Tea Break's second effect isn't certain to be activated. The player may not control a Puddingcess, and even if they did, it isn't certain they would use the effect. MadRest 23:35, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

So it's like how Stardust Dragon can't negate Snipe Hunter, because at the time you activate Hunter's effect, you can't know if Hunter will actually destroy a card, as per Card Rulings:Stardust Dragon, use control+F to search for the words Snipe Hunter. ---Dark Ace SP (Talk) 01:38, November 21, 2012 (UTC)

correct, and magical dimension doesn't allow for stardust to chain, as the destruction effect is optional and decided mid-resolution- too late to chain effects that ruling was the reason i was asking, same wording, wanted to confirm, forgot spell speeds... thxDreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 03:24, November 23, 2012 (UTC)