Changes
→why
The ban list exists to prevent the overuse of certain cards and promote use of other strategies - not to "hold players back", as you've been ridiculous enough to mention. [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] ([[User talk:Lord Grammaticus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lord Grammaticus|contribs]]) 19:36, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
and i think that you must be one of those people who thinks that if there were no forbidden list then every one '''would''' use the same cards witch '''would''' take skill out of the equation. how ever you seem to fail at realising the odds of you completeing said stratigy are slim. and there ''''''are''' other cards''' that '''can''' prevent this conbo being used with cards '''like''' prohibitation, tyrants tirade, prime material dragon, consecrated light, solemn judgement and solemn warrning witch would prevent CED's effect or summon and you '''could''' have a sangan/witch of your own when CED's effect is activated. however you '''do''' need to take luck into the equation meaning that you have just as much chance getting cards like the ones i listed as your opponent does of getting CED, sangan or the witch of the black forest on their side of the field.
also it would be just as easy to get three dark monsters in the graveyard as it would to get one light and dark monster in the graveyard. and even if the 1000 life points for CED is a cost you still lose 1000 life points meaning that theres not much diffrence between cost and damage.
also even if there was no banned list you could still construct a deck that has a good chance of winning any way. and if there was overuse of certain cards then surly players would be encouaged to create and promote new stratiges to defeat said cards that are being overused resulting in pushing players forward. this is something that you have clearly been stupid enough to over look.
