Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
Rename: Reply.
:::::::A big mess, I guess. But would cover everything. <span class="nowrap">[[User:Becasita|Becasita]] <sup><small>Pendulum</small></sup></span> <span class="nowrap">([[User talk:Becasita|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Becasita|contribs]])</span> 19:49, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
::::::::Having just made a whole bunch of categories to sort monsters by their material requirements, my thoughts were that it could be something along the lines of how I named those categories. For instance, [[Does not require specific Synchro Materials]] are for Synchro Monsters with completely generic materials, [[Does not require specific Tuner Synchro Materials]] is for Synchro Monsters with some sort of specific requirement for the Tuner but have generic non-Tuner materials, and [[Does not require specific non-Tuner Synchro Materials]] is for Synchro Monsters with some sort of specific requirement for the non-Tuner materials, but have no restrictions on what Tuner is used. My thoughts are that where Synchros with some sort of generic component to their materials is concerned, those three categories covered that aspect adequately. That said, the system does seem to fall apart for Synchro Monsters with specific requirements for both the Tuer and non-Tuner materials. For instance, I did make categories like [[Requires archetype specific Tuner Synchro Materials]] and [[Requires archetype specific non-Tuner Synchro Materials]], and a monster like [[Mecha Phantom Beast Jaculuslan]] would go in both of those categories. If we made categories for both Synchros that required Tuner Synchro Monsters and thoe that required Synchro Monsters as non-Tuner materials, I suppose any "Accel Synchro Monsters" would go in both of them. The issue is how to avoid that scenario. I suppose what you have proposed is likely the best option, though somewhat inelegant in execution. Do you wish to proceed with the idea that you proposed in that case? ([[User:Lucafriz|Lucafriz]] ([[User talk:Lucafriz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lucafriz|contribs]]) 00:03, March 3, 2017 (UTC)) :::::::::No, let's not proceed. Several people commented here. We shouldn't precipitate and be hasty. I'll have to read your text again, several times. Let's see if other people want to comment too. <span class="nowrap">[[User:Becasita|Becasita]] <sup><small>Pendulum</small></sup></span> <span class="nowrap">([[User talk:Becasita|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Becasita|contribs]])</span> 02:39, March 3, 2017 (UTC)
Bureaucrats, System administrator, Administrators
57,479
edits

Navigation menu