Difference between revisions of "Forum:Most overused deck type?"
m (→Objection to crab helmet) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Please sign your messages. To do so type four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | :Please sign your messages. To do so type four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | ||
:I don't think Crab Helmet's one to want a card Forbidden solely because it's difficult for them to beat it. If there's a reason "Dark Armed Dragon" should be Forbidden is because it's easy to Summon, can result in plus 3, in card advantage. Overall it doesn't require too much skill to use it. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 21:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | :I don't think Crab Helmet's one to want a card Forbidden solely because it's difficult for them to beat it. If there's a reason "Dark Armed Dragon" should be Forbidden is because it's easy to Summon, can result in plus 3, in card advantage. Overall it doesn't require too much skill to use it. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 21:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Dark Armed is strong, but I think it should be more of slowed, like demise, rather then just banned. That way you could still use deck, but would just be trickier to use. Also I try to keep most of my decks as original as I can, sometime ever at cost off effectiveness. Even with the 100s of deck types, will always be way more players, so very few effective decks will ever really be original.--[[User:BioMasterZap|Bio]] 22:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 26 June 2008
| Forums: | Index → General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion → Most overused deck type? Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5837 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
I'd just like to say, that after getting out and doing tournaments more, it seems like nobody is original anymore. Of all the times I dueled, all were either E-Hero decks or DD decks (macro cosmos-centered). For legal decks, they're really effective. But still... can't people be more original?
The Earl 06:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I tend to see Gladiator Beast decks fairly often, but rarely, do I ever see E-Hero decks. However, Macro decks are abundant, and I see maybe, four in a tournament with six rounds. >_>; 75.23.212.244 06:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- In sanctioned tournaments, it's actual usefulness of the deck > originality for most people. Either that, or competitive and original decks. --Pizzaman 07:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- By definition, "overused" means "used more than it should be", not "used a lot", so the most used deck is not necessarily the most overused deck. In my opinion, Dark Armed Return is the most overused deck, since it is extremely widely used and really should not be used at all, since Dark Armed Dragon should be banned. --Crab Helmet 07:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Objection to crab helmet
Why banned dark arm, are you scared that u will lose to such deck, i think that limiting it would be enough to change the game format, dun spoil fun. And wat i see, most people i play with use e hero, monarch or low level deck , which are fun unlike the competive deck, like dark armed return deck or dark deck 220.255.7.246 12:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Please sign your messages. To do so type four tildes (~~~~).
- I don't think Crab Helmet's one to want a card Forbidden solely because it's difficult for them to beat it. If there's a reason "Dark Armed Dragon" should be Forbidden is because it's easy to Summon, can result in plus 3, in card advantage. Overall it doesn't require too much skill to use it. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Dark Armed is strong, but I think it should be more of slowed, like demise, rather then just banned. That way you could still use deck, but would just be trickier to use. Also I try to keep most of my decks as original as I can, sometime ever at cost off effectiveness. Even with the 100s of deck types, will always be way more players, so very few effective decks will ever really be original.--Bio 22:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
