Difference between revisions of "Forum:PROPOSAL: Make Card Rulings pages editable only by Registered Users"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{Forumheader|Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki Discussion}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> We're currently experiencing a lot of vanda...)
 
(Agree, reason etc)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Discuss.--[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:TwoTailedFox|TwoTailedFox]] ([[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:TwoTailedFox|My Talk Page]]) 19:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 
Discuss.--[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:TwoTailedFox|TwoTailedFox]] ([[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:TwoTailedFox|My Talk Page]]) 19:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
*'''''Agree''''': I agree with locking the rulings pages to registered users only. People add unofficial and incorrect rulings based on their own observation of the card. It's easier to keep track of identified users and know if they're reliable. (not to say anonymous is always incorrect.) A small number of registered users and able to keep track and update the official ones. As far as I know there have been little major contributions from IP edits and masive amounts of incorrect additions. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 19:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:46, 19 August 2008


We're currently experiencing a lot of vandalism on Rulings pages by anonymous users, and we're thinking about a change to the way they are allowed to be edited.

We'd like to make the Rulings Pages only editable by Registered Users. No other pages are affected by this proposal, they're the only pages that don't need to be edited by Anonymous, and it would clear up a lot of issues with the outside world being skeptical of the Wikia, because Rulings are editable by everyone.

Discuss.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 19:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Agree: I agree with locking the rulings pages to registered users only. People add unofficial and incorrect rulings based on their own observation of the card. It's easier to keep track of identified users and know if they're reliable. (not to say anonymous is always incorrect.) A small number of registered users and able to keep track and update the official ones. As far as I know there have been little major contributions from IP edits and masive amounts of incorrect additions. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)