|
|
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | It would be cool and crazy if there was a synchro monster that required any or a specific fusion monster as a synchro-material monster.--[[User:Dragonking|Dragonking]] 02:36, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
| + | {{Talk header}} |
− | | + | '''Talk Pages are only for the discussion on how to improve the article. Please post your questions on the [[Forum:Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries|Rulings Forum]] and general discussion on the [[Forum:General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion|Forum]].''' |
− | :There are two, king... [[Naturia]] and [[Psychic]] fusions that required [[Synchro]] as Fusion material. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 02:42, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | ::I think Dragon meant a Synchro that required Fusions.[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 02:46, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | :::That's right, I'm aware of those fusion monsters, but I was thinking of a [[Fusion]]/[[Synchro]] relationship that goes the other way around. In fact, it would be cool if there was a fusion monster that required a [[Tuner Monster]] for a fusion-material, and turned out to be a Fusion/Tuner monster. A synchro monster that was so hard to summon that it required a specific fusion/tuner would have to be really powerful to be worth it.--[[User:Dragonking|Dragonking]] 21:26, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | :::: Two? First I've heard of it. [[User:Spinningfox|Spinningfox]] 01:01, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | ::::: Well now there are at least three counting [[Surging Dragon Knight Dragonquites]]. The [[Psychic]] fusion monster referenced above is in the same pack as the dragon ([[Duelist Revolution]]), and the [[Naturia]] fusion monster is in a recent [[Duel Terminal]], Right before Pulse of the Trishula I believe.--[[User:Dragonking|Dragonking]] 20:50, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
| |
Latest revision as of 05:44, 6 August 2018
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Miracle Synchro Fusion.
|
|
Please try to
- Be polite
- Assume good faith
- Be welcoming
|
Talk Pages are only for the discussion on how to improve the article. Please post your questions on the Rulings Forum and general discussion on the Forum.