Difference between revisions of "Forum:Soul Taker vs. Stardust Dragon"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[user:cow_pi|~Specter (cow_pi)]] 20:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC) | [[user:cow_pi|~Specter (cow_pi)]] 20:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | Right but would that matter because Stardust can negate any card that destroys a card on the field so I don't quite see where your going with this. [[Special:Contributions/137.104.83.207|137.104.83.207]] 20:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC) | + | Right but would that matter because Stardust can negate any card that destroys a card on the field so I don't quite see where your going with this. The reason I bring this up is because if you look at the rulings page for Prime Material Dragon (which is basically the same thing as stardust) Prime Material Dragon can negate soul taker so I don't believe that stardust would miss the timing.[[Special:Contributions/137.104.83.207|137.104.83.207]] 20:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:59, 27 April 2009
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries → Soul Taker vs. Stardust Dragon Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5538 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
Can Stardust Dragon Tribute itself to negate Soul Taker's first effect? I think it would miss the timing, since the monster's destruction is not the last thing to resolve.
~Specter (cow_pi) 20:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Right but would that matter because Stardust can negate any card that destroys a card on the field so I don't quite see where your going with this. The reason I bring this up is because if you look at the rulings page for Prime Material Dragon (which is basically the same thing as stardust) Prime Material Dragon can negate soul taker so I don't believe that stardust would miss the timing.137.104.83.207 20:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
