Difference between revisions of "Forum:Obelisk vs solemn warning?"
(Created page with "{{Forum/header|Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> so obelisk was changed to face-do...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
so obelisk was changed to face-down defense position by maestroke the symphony djinn. afterwards, obelisk flips back up to attack mode and solemn warning is activated. does solemn warning destroy obelisk? | so obelisk was changed to face-down defense position by maestroke the symphony djinn. afterwards, obelisk flips back up to attack mode and solemn warning is activated. does solemn warning destroy obelisk? | ||
| + | |||
| + | : yeah, most likely since its Normal Summon is the only one that states it cannot be negated - Flip Summon not included. [[Special:Contributions/24.83.215.20|24.83.215.20]] ([[User talk:24.83.215.20|talk]]) 19:57, June 15, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:57, 15 June 2012
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries → Obelisk vs solemn warning? Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 4377 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
so obelisk was changed to face-down defense position by maestroke the symphony djinn. afterwards, obelisk flips back up to attack mode and solemn warning is activated. does solemn warning destroy obelisk?
- yeah, most likely since its Normal Summon is the only one that states it cannot be negated - Flip Summon not included. 24.83.215.20 (talk) 19:57, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
