Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tributes itself for cost"
BritishCynic (talk | contribs) m |
(→Quick Query) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Then, take it out yourself if you feel that's necessary. [[Special:Contributions/70.79.84.206|70.79.84.206]] ([[User talk:70.79.84.206|talk]]) 01:21, December 4, 2012 (UTC) | : Then, take it out yourself if you feel that's necessary. [[Special:Contributions/70.79.84.206|70.79.84.206]] ([[User talk:70.79.84.206|talk]]) 01:21, December 4, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I wanted to get some community input first, as it may require a reassessment of how monsters are classed in this category. Same reassessment should also apply to [[3-Hump Lacooda]], as the effect essentially activates on one monster, and that Tributes 2 '''other''' monsters for it's effect activation. [[Allure Queen LV5]] doesn't even '''have''' a Tribute effect in it's lore.--[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:TwoTailedFox|TwoTailedFox]] ([[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:TwoTailedFox|My Talk Page]]) 01:24, December 4, 2012 (UTC) | ::I wanted to get some community input first, as it may require a reassessment of how monsters are classed in this category. Same reassessment should also apply to [[3-Hump Lacooda]], as the effect essentially activates on one monster, and that Tributes 2 '''other''' monsters for it's effect activation. [[Allure Queen LV5]] doesn't even '''have''' a Tribute effect in it's lore.--[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:TwoTailedFox|TwoTailedFox]] ([[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:TwoTailedFox|My Talk Page]]) 01:24, December 4, 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: Just give a brief reason why you changed it like "It doesn't actually state that it tributes itself for cost". secondly, don't use "it's" as a possessive. It's = It is. "Its" is the proper word. Always seeing people doing that... [[Special:Contributions/70.79.84.206|70.79.84.206]] ([[User talk:70.79.84.206|talk]]) 02:40, December 4, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:40, 4 December 2012
Quick Query
If we take the literal meaning that the monster is required to be Tributed for it's effect, it can be argued that neither Cannon Soldier nor Cannon Soldier MK-2 should be in this category, as self-sacrifice isn't an absolute requirement for it's effect activation.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 01:20, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Then, take it out yourself if you feel that's necessary. 70.79.84.206 (talk) 01:21, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
- I wanted to get some community input first, as it may require a reassessment of how monsters are classed in this category. Same reassessment should also apply to 3-Hump Lacooda, as the effect essentially activates on one monster, and that Tributes 2 other monsters for it's effect activation. Allure Queen LV5 doesn't even have a Tribute effect in it's lore.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 01:24, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Just give a brief reason why you changed it like "It doesn't actually state that it tributes itself for cost". secondly, don't use "it's" as a possessive. It's = It is. "Its" is the proper word. Always seeing people doing that... 70.79.84.206 (talk) 02:40, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
