Difference between revisions of "Card Trivia:Elemental HERO Rampart Blaster"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Evil heroes don't count with what I'm trying to say.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* This card has an "[[Heroes#Evil Heroes|Evil Hero]]" counterpart, "[[Evil Hero Infernal Sniper]]".
 
* This card has an "[[Heroes#Evil Heroes|Evil Hero]]" counterpart, "[[Evil Hero Infernal Sniper]]".
 
* This card is the only [[Elemental Hero]] fusion monster that appears female.
 
* This card is the only [[Elemental Hero]] fusion monster that appears female.
 +
* This card is the only card known to still have a ruling discrepancy between the TCG and OCG; in the OCG, it could not attack the opponent directly unless the opponent controlled no monsters while in the TCG, it ''could'' attack if the opponent controlled monsters. According to popular legend, the TCG refused to adapt the OCG ruling, because of how the ruling clashed with the card's written effect (it made no mention of needing the opponent to control no cards for it to attack directly, and as per ruling guidelines, the card's written effect trumps all); the OCG supposedly eventually admitted the TCG's interpretation of this card's effect was correct, and their ruling was in error, but refused to change it to reflect this admission, meaning this card is the only one to have its effect be played in two different ways, to this day.

Revision as of 18:35, 6 January 2009

  • Her guns are given orbs in the TCG.
  • This card has an "Evil Hero" counterpart, "Evil Hero Infernal Sniper".
  • This card is the only Elemental Hero fusion monster that appears female.
  • This card is the only card known to still have a ruling discrepancy between the TCG and OCG; in the OCG, it could not attack the opponent directly unless the opponent controlled no monsters while in the TCG, it could attack if the opponent controlled monsters. According to popular legend, the TCG refused to adapt the OCG ruling, because of how the ruling clashed with the card's written effect (it made no mention of needing the opponent to control no cards for it to attack directly, and as per ruling guidelines, the card's written effect trumps all); the OCG supposedly eventually admitted the TCG's interpretation of this card's effect was correct, and their ruling was in error, but refused to change it to reflect this admission, meaning this card is the only one to have its effect be played in two different ways, to this day.