|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Forum/header|General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion}}
| |
| | | | |
| − | I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but [[Jack Atlas]] uses a group of cards in the [[Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's|anime]] that all have "Power" at the start of their names; the [[Power Invader|Invader]], [[Power Supplier|Supplier]], [[Power Breaker|Breaker]] and [[Power Giant|Giant]] have been seen so far. I was wondering why this group of cards is not being treated as an [[Archetype]] on this wiki; is there some criteria that I don't know about?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | With just four monsters, the group is already larger than some established Archetypes and as far as I can tell they all share a family name. They also have a similarity to most other Archetypes in that a duelist from the anime ([[Jack Atlas|Jack]]) uses them regularly. Would it be possible to get them their own Archetype page in the near future, or is there something I just can't see? --[[User:Kasei|'''Kasei''']][[User talk:Kasei|'''Wages''']][[Special:Contributions/Kasei|'''War''']][[File:Rage.PNG|41px]] 04:07, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :In addition, the cards [[Key Mouse]], [[Lock Cat]], [[Chain Dog]] and the new [[TCG Exclusives|TCG Exclusive]] [[Droll & Lock Bird]] all seem to belong to an Archetypal family of monsters. They all run very well together, and have names and card images that match up with one another. I'm also putting them up for consideration.--[[User:Kasei|'''Kasei''']][[User talk:Kasei|'''Wages''']][[Special:Contributions/Kasei|'''War''']][[File:Rage.PNG|41px]] 04:31, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Category:Archetype]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It could be a contender...[[User:BassNettoHikari2|BassNettoHikari2]]...[[User talk:BassNettoHikari2|Chat Page]]... 05:01, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | That's good and all, but to be a contender is never good enough in my eyes. --[[User:Kasei|'''Kasei''']][[User talk:Kasei|'''Wages''']][[Special:Contributions/Kasei|'''War''']][[File:Rage.PNG|41px]] 17:23, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I think of Power as a type of strategy, not an archetype so let's just leave that there. [[User:Fallensilence|Fallensilence]] ([[User talk:Fallensilence|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fallensilence|contribs]]) 23:17, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Well Roses are now considered an Archetype...[[User:BassNettoHikari2|BassNettoHikari2]]...[[User talk:BassNettoHikari2|Chat Page]]... 05:04, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :That's because the card "[[Rose Lover]]" supports cards with ''Rose'' 「ローズ」 in their names. About the Power group, it's just like Yusei's [[Warriors]]. So, yes, it can be treated as a non-supported Archetype, like the [[Monarchs]]. --[[User:Missign0|Missign0]] ([[User talk:Missign0|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missign0|contribs]]) 06:59, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hm............archetypes can be so interesting sometimes. [[User:Fallensilence|Fallensilence]] ([[User talk:Fallensilence|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fallensilence|contribs]]) 02:27, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Alright, if there's no further problems, I'll make a page later today for these guys.--[[User:Kasei|'''Kasei''']][[User talk:Kasei|'''Wages''']][[Special:Contributions/Kasei|'''War''']][[File:Rage.PNG|41px]] 16:20, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
| |
