Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chimeratech"
(→Redundancy) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I think they're more of a sub-archtype, like XX-Sabers. | I think they're more of a sub-archtype, like XX-Sabers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, but there are only two cards in the set, meaning they serve just as much of a purpose merged. Cyber Eltannin is, well, look at the first word in its name. It is only thematically similar. [[Special:Contributions/74.194.224.252|74.194.224.252]] 21:53, May 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:53, 15 May 2010
Chimeratech Overdragon can be easily summoned by overload fusion with Cyber Dragon and more than one other machine in the grave
I think that Cyber Dragon Zwei should be treated as Cyber Dragon while in the hand too.
If it was, you probably could only have 2 in a deck.
CHIMERATECHS ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Redundancy
It is redundant to consider the Chimeratechs their own archetype. They rely on Cyber Dragon and are thus integrated into that archetype. Furthermore, Cyber Dragon support also affects these cards, as it normally targets "a card that lists "Cyber Dragon" as a fusion material. This article should be merged. I am not being shallow; I am blunt, obvious and to the point. 74.194.224.252 01:50, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
I think they're more of a sub-archtype, like XX-Sabers.
Yes, but there are only two cards in the set, meaning they serve just as much of a purpose merged. Cyber Eltannin is, well, look at the first word in its name. It is only thematically similar. 74.194.224.252 21:53, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
