208,580
edits
Changes
→Purpose of this page
::::::::How very strange. I remembered that I started something, but I thought someone else had already made a better version, so I stopped. ''Somehow'' I must have been thinking about [[User:Dinoguy1000/monster stuff/attribute vs type|this]]. Hehe, whoops. --[[User:Golden Key|Golden Key]] ([[User talk:Golden Key|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Golden Key|contribs]]) 13:49, July 26, 2016 (UTC)
:::::I don't understand the trivia page suggestion. A list alerts/reminds you of the existence of female cards. If you're viewing a trivia page, you'll already aware of the card and in most cases won't need to be told its gender. "* This card is female." on each trivia page is too much.
:::::"All models are wrong, but some are useful." The page acknowledgingly lists cards which may be disputed, but it still succeeds in informing people of the majority of female cards.
:::::I also don't like that cards depicting females, but whose subjects aren't female, are listed. I think they should be removed either way.
:::::There is more of a demand for knowing what ''OCG'' cards are female than which ones are blue or shelled.
:::::I don't mean to come across as a huge supporter of this page. I just want to put the logic on the table. If the "there's a portion of people interested in knowing" case is too narrow to warrant inclusion, I'd be happy to strip this page down to just the mediums where female is a mechanic and if desired, let the forum handle the rest. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 19:13, July 26, 2016 (UTC)
