Difference between revisions of "Talk:September 2009 Lists (OCG)"
(→No basis: There is the Proof, and it is OFFICIAL) |
(→I am unaware of all this: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:*Those that doubt it, here is your PROOF: http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/limited/ | :*Those that doubt it, here is your PROOF: http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/limited/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I am unaware of all this == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am not sure what is right and what is not, but I will not change my decks until I have to. The link I followed I came across through this forum, not sure what is valid and what is not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Special:Contributions/24.101.55.232|24.101.55.232]] 15:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:54, 21 August 2009
No basis
There is No basis for this list as of August 19th 2009. Konami has not yet released the new ban/restricted list. This was taken almost word for word from POJO FORUMS. Any self respecting duelist will not base their deck on this list until it is confirmed. — This unsigned comment was made by 74.67.189.192 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- This info was taken from Shriek.twoday.net, who got it from V-Jump. If you found a word for word duplicate of this article on Pojo, it was most likely copied from here. -- Deltaneos (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Those that doubt it, here is your PROOF: http://www.yugioh-card.com/en/limited/
I am unaware of all this
I am not sure what is right and what is not, but I will not change my decks until I have to. The link I followed I came across through this forum, not sure what is valid and what is not.
24.101.55.232 15:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
