User talk:NMBRHNTR64

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

2013 tins

The guy was pandering to an audience. I apologize for not responding earlier. In the future, replying on Forum:Admin noticeboard after 3 undos by both users (6 undos overall) is the rule of thumb for things like this. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:09, August 5, 2013 (UTC)

Shark is Nasch

Just wondering ahve you read Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Episode 121 and Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL - Episode 122 cause uh; please explain to me how they do not confirm this? no offence, but uhh... :/ :S --slave(command) 23:35, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

"Episode descriptions aside, we have not seen this for ourselves." -Uhh okay..? What is wrong with the Episode descriptions? seriously?! and as far as they go I haven't made any assumptions - although technically that each Barian Emperor has a Over-Hundred Number and a Legendary Number connected to them hasn't been explicitly stated... So I will also concede to that but it clearly states that Shark is Nasch. What is wrong with the previews? - I mean can we delete all the pages that haven't been officially dubbed as those of us that don't know Japanese have't heard everything in them!??? --slave(command) 23:45, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
Episode descriptions have been wrong before! We need to see the relationship between Shark and Nasch in the episode before we immediately make changes like that. We do not have all the info we need yet. Plus, there are still many questions about them that have not yet been answered. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 00:12, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
Very well then :) t'is a rather large can of worms. I shall refrain from doing so. --slave(command) 00:14, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. All I want is accurate info for the readers. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 00:17, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
no, thank you, and sorry :( Although unrelated to shark/nasch etc, but something as far as accuracy: Number C39: Utopia Ray Neo - I don't think it has been confirmed anywhere that is is Chaos Xyz/Chaos Number..? :s I don't know how to properly request for the page to be moved or what? :s Once again sorry; and I don't mean to create more work but just figured you would have a better idea here. :) --slave(command) 00:41, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
No problem! :) To be truthful, I am not sure that page should even exist, despite the fact that he is in the episode title, but there not much arguing with an episode title. I agree that it may not even be a Number C but if I were you, for the time being, I would just wait for a response on its Talk page. If no response for a while, I would then talk to an Admin about it, but I am going to try to not get involved in a possible edit-war on that one. If nessesary though, I will back you up on it. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 00:55, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
Okay, thanks very much :) :) :) And yeah I'll leave it for a while. --slave(command) 00:57, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

STOP EDIT WARRING

You are accomplishing nothing. seriously why can't you talk? --slave(command) 07:16, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

I suggested talking, but he didn't respond. He is the one being a child about this. Now that he has started talking, I will see if I can try to settle this. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 10:48, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
Coolios, I just copy pasted that message in to the you guys walls without looking who XD, I just clicked on the talk pages from the history XD ...IMHO you should have gone to the mods earlier ...like you did with me ;) XD lol --slave(command) 10:59, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
LOL. Deltaneos protected the page. I guess that resolves this…for now, anyway. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 20:06, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

This is a reminder to not edit-war. If you do something like this again, you will be blocked as a reminder not to do so. The fact that you gave up on trying to explain your revert means that your "reverting" was no longer justified, and you were playing a childish game with the other user. Even so, if you revert back and forth for about 3 times, just report it at Forum:Admin noticeboard and stop edit warring. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 17:52, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, alright, my bad. Some people just don't listen and that ticks me off. But, I will try not to handle things like that again. Thanks for the warning. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 17:55, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Speculation of speculation

Would you please stop assuming that contents of pages are speculation?? Because that itself is a speculation.. thx Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 20:51, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Can you give me a specific example? NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 20:55, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm not even sure what your arguing

Please. Here's a quick look at a few different peoples lives:
A) Human-past-life-Merag/Nasch
B) Barian-past-life-Merag/Nasch
C) Original-Rio/Reginald (before car crash)
D) Amnesiac-barian-soul-Rio/Reginald (after car crash)
E) Barian-Nasch/Merag
Which of these do you want on separate pages, or together? --slave(command•works) 05:56, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Lets leave this discussion on Talk:Rio Kastle. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 06:06, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Sources

Tell me, what do YOU think justifies a legit source? Theres many sources out there, sources most of us have probably never heard of. And chances are, those sources could be even more legit than the ones we have now. --DysonSlinky (talk • contribs) 18:08, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

We haven't cited it at all. The only reason it was there in the first place is because some random user put it there when he claimed Number 43 and 80 were confirmed to be released in the set. That site itself claims that, while there is no legit proof other than their Number C forms being confirmed. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 18:19, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Candidates for deletion

Please do not blank pages when you nominate them for deletion. Place your reason for nominating it in the notice so that the admin can easily read both it an the article and decide if the nomination is valid. Otherwise we need to look at page history, which is an unnecessary extra step. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 13:51, February 13, 2014 (UTC)

Hey Thanks ^^

Thanks for adding the whole Decklists of the Millennium Duels characters. I'd do it myself, but it isn't on my marketplace yet, so i've been going off of what I see in videos xD TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 02:10, March 28, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah Dx Some of the Decklists really make me question what the programmers were on when they made them. Do you happen to know if there is a more challenging mode to Duel characters on? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:42, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

Forum Discussion

I of course know the Shadow Realm is a fictional place--I even wrote that in my post. I am merely trying to write a fanfiction story, and it involves the English dub's hell-like area, so I wanted info on certain things, such as the damage to a character's physical body after their soul/mind has been trapped there too long. Your post seemed quite rude, as if trying to tell me I didn't know this "eternal darkness" was fake in our real world. If you know any possible "true" answer for the fiction of Yu-Gi-Oh!, please put it in the general forum discussion. Thank you.Mistystar31 (talk • contribs) 06:12, December 8, 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://yugipedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:NMBRHNTR64&oldid=2613340"