Editing Forum:We need Ideas For More WDC
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
You think we could run more than one /assault mode monster? I could make a stardust + red dragon assault mode deck. [[User:Drew-Gi-Oh!|Drew-Gi-Oh!]] ([[User talk:Drew-Gi-Oh!|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drew-Gi-Oh!|contribs]]) 16:08, July 17, 2010 (UTC) | You think we could run more than one /assault mode monster? I could make a stardust + red dragon assault mode deck. [[User:Drew-Gi-Oh!|Drew-Gi-Oh!]] ([[User talk:Drew-Gi-Oh!|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drew-Gi-Oh!|contribs]]) 16:08, July 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | If I was in the competion Id use [[Stardust Dragon/Assault Mode]] | ||
== I have a question == | == I have a question == |