Editing User:GenericMadScientist/World Championship 2005 enemy decks
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page is not enabled for semantic in-text annotations due to namespace restrictions. Details about how to enable the namespace can be found on the configuration help page.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
3. Attack guide 0 and defense guide 2100 ([[Soul Tiger (World Championship 2005)|Soul Tiger]]'s stats). The attack guide gets changed to 1000, so the two intervals are {600, ..., 1111} and {1214, ..., 2333}. Note the two intervals do not join to form one interval, for example [[Hitotsu-Me Giant (World Championship 2005)|Hitotsu-Me Giant]] (1200 attack) is not permissible. | 3. Attack guide 0 and defense guide 2100 ([[Soul Tiger (World Championship 2005)|Soul Tiger]]'s stats). The attack guide gets changed to 1000, so the two intervals are {600, ..., 1111} and {1214, ..., 2333}. Note the two intervals do not join to form one interval, for example [[Hitotsu-Me Giant (World Championship 2005)|Hitotsu-Me Giant]] (1200 attack) is not permissible. | ||
− | One point about this procedure is it does not look at how many copies of a card the player already has. Therefore it's possible for the AI to end up with a 39 | + | One point about this procedure is it does not look at how many copies of a card the player already has. Therefore I conjecture it's possible for the AI to end up with a 39 card deck, by being given a 4th copy of a normal monster in the second padding. However, I need to test this to see if it works as I believe. |
The check on the generated card is coded very strangely. I speculate that the procedure was meant to be along the lines of | The check on the generated card is coded very strangely. I speculate that the procedure was meant to be along the lines of |