Difference between revisions of "Forum:Question about Black Rose Dragon"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Duelist33|Duelist33]] 18:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Duelist33|Duelist33]] 18:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | *You cannot activate [[Black Rose Dragon]]'s effect to an already face-up attack position monster, since you cannot resolve the first part of it's effect. [[User:ATEMVEGETA|ATEMVEGETA]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | + | *You cannot activate [[Black Rose Dragon]]'s effect to an already face-up attack position monster, since you cannot resolve the first part of it's second effect. [[User:ATEMVEGETA|ATEMVEGETA]] ([[User_talk:ATEMVEGETA|Talk]]) 21:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:32, 4 February 2009
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries → Question about Black Rose Dragon Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5609 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
This is a direct quote from the rulings page of Black Rose Dragon, I just want a clarification:
If the monster targeted by "Black Rose Dragon's" second effect is not changed to Attack Position by "Black Rose Dragon's" effect, its ATK is not reduced to 0.[1]
The clarification that I am needing, last night my Girlfriend had Gaia Knight, the Force of Earth on the field in attack position. I was able to Synchro Summon BRD and then, I used it's effect to lower Gaia's attack to 0, and destroy it. Was I able to do that, since Gaia was already in attack position. By reading that ruling, I was unable to do that. Was that a legal play.
Duelist33 18:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- You cannot activate Black Rose Dragon's effect to an already face-up attack position monster, since you cannot resolve the first part of it's second effect. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
