Difference between revisions of "Talk:May 2002 Lists (TCG)"
(→Proposal concerning Statistics) |
MasterMarik (talk | contribs) (→Proposal concerning Statistics) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I don't think that's necessary as they're the same thing. --[[User:MasterMarik|MasterMarik]] ([[User talk:MasterMarik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MasterMarik|contribs]]) 11:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | :I don't think that's necessary as they're the same thing. --[[User:MasterMarik|MasterMarik]] ([[User talk:MasterMarik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MasterMarik|contribs]]) 11:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ::true both terms mean the same thing. i know, i remember the old days. | |
+ | ::maybe it was silly of me to imply that someone might not know. | ||
+ | ::<br>but nonetheless, most of the other articles on banlists say "Spell Cards" not "Magic Cards". | ||
+ | ::this is true even for the old OCG lists like [[February_2000_Lists]]. | ||
+ | ::that's some kind of inconsistency... i just wanted to point this out. | ||
+ | ::<br>correct me if i'm wrong, but i assumed that almost all yugioh.wikia-articles other than this one say "Spell Cards", too? so why does this one say "Magic Cards" instead? | ||
+ | ::[[User:DK-ZERO|DK-ZERO]] ([[User talk:DK-ZERO|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DK-ZERO|contribs]]) 18:47, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Proposal concerning Statistics == | ||
add some information on how many card were restricted: | add some information on how many card were restricted: | ||
Line 23: | Line 31: | ||
::anyone who has learned how to count can find out how many rares TDGS had; just look at the list and start counting, easy as that, right? | ::anyone who has learned how to count can find out how many rares TDGS had; just look at the list and start counting, easy as that, right? | ||
::<br>ps. [[March_2017_Lists]] has 168 cards included. that's a mildly interesting fact. | ::<br>ps. [[March_2017_Lists]] has 168 cards included. that's a mildly interesting fact. | ||
− | ::[[User:DK-ZERO|DK-ZERO]] ([[User talk:DK-ZERO|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DK-ZERO|contribs]]) 18: | + | ::[[User:DK-ZERO|DK-ZERO]] ([[User talk:DK-ZERO|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DK-ZERO|contribs]]) 18:43, May 8, 2017 (UTC) |
+ | ::Thing is, you're comparing a 100 card set to a list of like 20 cards. It's a lot harder to find specific cards in a 100 card list than a 20 card list. Besides, the pack actually lists it whereas the Banned List does not. --[[User:MasterMarik|MasterMarik]] ([[User talk:MasterMarik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MasterMarik|contribs]]) 00:54, May 10, 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Yeah, I like the idea. But I'd prefer doing that through a template, though. Don't spread it much for now, I'd say. <span class="nowrap">[[User:Becasita|Becasita]] <sup><small>Pendulum</small></sup></span> <span class="nowrap">([[User talk:Becasita|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Becasita|contribs]])</span> 19:10, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::that's what i had in mind, too. but unfortunately i don't have a clue about how to implement said template. if someone else could provide one, that would be neat. other than that, i think i should be able to fill that template out, though... for now, i shall keep still and wait. :) | ||
+ | ::[[User:DK-ZERO|DK-ZERO]] ([[User talk:DK-ZERO|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DK-ZERO|contribs]]) 20:52, May 8, 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::I'll try to mess with some stuff during this week, if I have the time. Any suggestions, let me know. <span class="nowrap">[[User:Becasita|Becasita]] <sup><small>Pendulum</small></sup></span> <span class="nowrap">([[User talk:Becasita|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Becasita|contribs]])</span> 21:53, May 8, 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:54, 10 May 2017
This is the talk page for discussing the page, May 2002 Lists (TCG). | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
Is there no record of old OCG lists? --Cropz 01:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Proposal concerning Terminology[edit]
either instead of writing Magic Cards write Spell Cards, or add some disclaimer like this one:
"Note that until the release of Magician's Force Spell Cards were called Magic Cards in the TCG.
"DK-ZERO (talk • contribs) 19:54, May 7, 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think that's necessary as they're the same thing. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 11:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
- true both terms mean the same thing. i know, i remember the old days.
- maybe it was silly of me to imply that someone might not know.
but nonetheless, most of the other articles on banlists say "Spell Cards" not "Magic Cards".- this is true even for the old OCG lists like February_2000_Lists.
- that's some kind of inconsistency... i just wanted to point this out.
correct me if i'm wrong, but i assumed that almost all yugioh.wikia-articles other than this one say "Spell Cards", too? so why does this one say "Magic Cards" instead?- DK-ZERO (talk • contribs) 18:47, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
Proposal concerning Statistics[edit]
add some information on how many card were restricted:
eg "In total this list contained 12 cards:
5 Monster Cards, 7 Magic Cards, 0 Trap Cards"
DK-ZERO (talk • contribs) 19:55, May 7, 2017 (UTC)
- Anyone that has learned how to count can find out how many cards were in each of the lists. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 11:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
- so you vote against my proposal on those grounds? ok.
- why then does eg The_Duelist_Genesis#Breakdown exist?
- anyone who has learned how to count can find out how many rares TDGS had; just look at the list and start counting, easy as that, right?
ps. March_2017_Lists has 168 cards included. that's a mildly interesting fact.- DK-ZERO (talk • contribs) 18:43, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
- Thing is, you're comparing a 100 card set to a list of like 20 cards. It's a lot harder to find specific cards in a 100 card list than a 20 card list. Besides, the pack actually lists it whereas the Banned List does not. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 00:54, May 10, 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, I like the idea. But I'd prefer doing that through a template, though. Don't spread it much for now, I'd say. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 19:10, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
- that's what i had in mind, too. but unfortunately i don't have a clue about how to implement said template. if someone else could provide one, that would be neat. other than that, i think i should be able to fill that template out, though... for now, i shall keep still and wait. :)
- DK-ZERO (talk • contribs) 20:52, May 8, 2017 (UTC)