Forum:D.D warior
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries → D.D warior Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 3961 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
If D.D. Warrior attack a face-down fiber jar, D.D. Warrior would be chain link 1, and fiber jar chain link 2, would D.D warrior and fiber jar still be remove from play from the deck, when D.D Warrior resolve, unlike here counter part that is optional?96.44.92.186 (talk) 02:19, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
I just what to know if D.D. Warrior effect get's lost in the deck, because Fiber jar Resolve first?96.44.92.186 (talk) 13:44, June 26, 2013 (UTC)
- See Card Rulings:D.D. Warrior Lady then use Ctrl+F to search for "Fiber Jar". --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 14:20, June 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, you asked for D.D. Warrior, well it should be reversed in that case, so Fiber Jar would resolve first and then Warrior would resolve without effect. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 14:23, June 26, 2013 (UTC)
If D.D Warrior attack a face-down penguin soldier, even if D.D. warrior is in hand When D.D. Warrior resolve it is still banish with penguin soldier. What do you think about that. That ruling would not change anything about the effect getting lost in the deck right?96.44.92.186 (talk) 15:27, June 26, 2013 (UTC)
