Talk:Infernity Deck

This article was showing red, so I decided to pass time and think of a Infernity Deck.Vehicroidsrage 23:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

i wouldn't put reckless greed as if u get a dead draw it may screw u up for 2 turns till u can get something to discard i would add a card destruction in this even or hand destruction Sammykill98 23:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion

i think we should keep it because it is just starting out and we should wait for more cards to be released till we say its just a bad set of cards — This unsigned comment was made by 68.42.15.154 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

We don't quite work that way. We don't make articles on a subject in the hopes that they will be notable someday and delete after finding out they're not. The subject should be notable before given an article.

Besides that's irrelevant, it's not flagged for Deletion because it's a bad Deck. I don't think users should just arbitrarily stick the name of an archetype, card or mechanic before the word Deck and create an article about it. An "Infernity" Deck is by definition a Deck that uses "Infernity" cards. There's no need for an article to say that. After that people are just using such pages to post whatever they think works well with that archetype. That should really be posted on the Archetype (Type, Attribute or Card Tips) page. "Infernity" is the Deck concept, it has an article, so there's no need for this. Allowing for people to post it under a Deck article allows for people to create pretty much anything. So hypothecially people could create a Deck page for every card or something silly like "Exodia Synchro Zombie Stall Deck".

Also, see: Talk:Assault Mode Deck. -- Deltaneos (talk) 09:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

your forgetting that this archtype may still be very effitiant in the right hands. Once the rest of the Infernity monsters and their trap card comes out they will be a formidable opponent. — This unsigned comment was made by 69.141.151.83 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

You're just repeating the first arguement. As I said it's not flagged for deletion for being a bad Deck. The issue is not good Decks gets articles, bad Decks don't.

And (also addressed above) relying on more cards to be released for it to be considered good is predicting that it will notable in the future. That's not how things work. We don't create articles, wait to see if they're become notable, then decide to delete or keep. (That's irrelevant anyway as the issue is not good Decks vs. bad Decks.) -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I beleive this deck should stay. I have been trying to make an Infernity Deck and its a lot more complicated than it might sound. Having this page would allow those of us who want to make an Infernity Deck to share their ideas and stratigies. Such as the possibility of removal or maybe even synchro. From: EvilEye42