Difference between revisions of "Talk:Points to"
(→Is this page really necessary?: new section) |
(→Is this page really necessary?) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I suggest merging with the Link Arrows page. [[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 05:50, June 13, 2017 (UTC) | I suggest merging with the Link Arrows page. [[User:Lightning Laxus|Lightning Laxus]] ([[User talk:Lightning Laxus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lightning Laxus|contribs]]) 05:50, June 13, 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I suppose we could move this page to "point" and make it about the meaning of the term "point" in the context of Link Monsters. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 07:46, June 13, 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:46, 13 June 2017
Is this page really necessary?
It seems to be just an extension of Link Arrows, similar to "co-linked" is to "linked." It is simply whatever those arrows are pointing at.
TCG never even gave it a proper term name, and refers to it only as "points to." It is unlikely that it'll give it one at all, and I don't want this page to be the unofficial "Link Point" forever.
I suggest merging with the Link Arrows page. Lightning Laxus (talk • contribs) 05:50, June 13, 2017 (UTC)