Editing Talk:Duelist Pack: Kaiba
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Duelist Pack: Kaiba. | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
This page is not enabled for semantic in-text annotations due to namespace restrictions. Details about how to enable the namespace can be found on the configuration help page.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Talkheader}} |
=="Blue-Eyes White Dragon" Effect Monster== | =="Blue-Eyes White Dragon" Effect Monster== | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::While we do use placeholder names, they should be logical changes. e.g. calling "Antique Gear Ultimate Golem", "Ancient Gear Ultimate Golem" or in rare cases, a description of what it is e.g. [[fifth Dragon]]. We wouldn't give something the same name as another card, unless we knew it had the same name. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 02:39, January 28, 2010 (UTC) | ::While we do use placeholder names, they should be logical changes. e.g. calling "Antique Gear Ultimate Golem", "Ancient Gear Ultimate Golem" or in rare cases, a description of what it is e.g. [[fifth Dragon]]. We wouldn't give something the same name as another card, unless we knew it had the same name. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 02:39, January 28, 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | :::I would just like to point out a few things. First, we do have monsters that have been recreated with the same name. [[Harpie Lady]] was recreated with many multiple cards such as [[Harpie Lady 1]]. Due to the effect/condition these cards have, their names are considered the same just for deck construction. The name just makes it easier for us to descuss them without explaining which one I mean. Second, There IS a card that was a normal monster that was since also made into an effect monster. Its name? Obelisk the Tormentor. Origionally, this card could not be used. Now, this card has an effect card <u>with the exact same name</u> as well as being legal for play. While the first wasn't legal for play, it still was the first to be noted. | + | :::I would just like to point out a few things. First, we do have monsters that have been recreated with the same name. [[Harpie Lady]] was recreated with many multiple cards such as [[Harpie Lady 1]]. Due to the effect/condition these cards have, their names are considered the same just for deck construction. The name just makes it easier for us to descuss them without explaining which one I mean. Second, There IS a card that was a normal monster that was since also made into an effect monster. Its name? Obelisk the Tormentor. Origionally, this card could not be used. Now, this card has an effect card <u>with the exact same name</u> as well as being legal for play. While the first wasn't legal for play, it still was the first to be noted. {{unsigned|LordGeovanni|09:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)}} |
::::In my first post, I said that they haven't made 2 '''legal''' cards with the same '''printed''' name. | ::::In my first post, I said that they haven't made 2 '''legal''' cards with the same '''printed''' name. | ||
− | ::::Cards like the first "[[Obelisk the Tormentor]]" and the Normal Monster "[[Black Luster Soldier ( | + | ::::Cards like the first "[[Obelisk the Tormentor]]" and the Normal Monster "[[Black Luster Soldier (DM)|Black Luster Soldier]]" are Illegal. They can't be used in accordance to the official rules. It is possible that they could create an Illegal "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" or even make two Legal cards with the same printed name for the first time. Point is, we don't know that at this stage, so we shouldn't go ahead saying they have the same printed name until we know. |
::::If this "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" card is like "[[A Legendary Ocean]]" and "[[Cyber Harpie Lady]]" it would have its own uniqye printed name, calling the article ''Blue-Eyes White Dragon (Effect Monster)'', would imply that the printed name of the card is "Blue-Eyes White Dragon". | ::::If this "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" card is like "[[A Legendary Ocean]]" and "[[Cyber Harpie Lady]]" it would have its own uniqye printed name, calling the article ''Blue-Eyes White Dragon (Effect Monster)'', would imply that the printed name of the card is "Blue-Eyes White Dragon". | ||
:::: -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 12:56, January 28, 2010 (UTC) | :::: -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 12:56, January 28, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
::Yeah, the TCG site tends not to acknowledge the Japanese version. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 22:21, February 11, 2010 (UTC) | ::Yeah, the TCG site tends not to acknowledge the Japanese version. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 22:21, February 11, 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | :::Yeah. I'm pretty sure we can all assume it's Sin Blue-Eyes but one thing makes me wonder like Sonic0chick0ames says. Yeah it's true that they could just be ignoring the ocg like they tend to do but we could be getting a 2 for 1 Sin and a new one too. (Just trying to be optimistic here) | + | :::Yeah. I'm pretty sure we can all assume it's Sin Blue-Eyes but one thing makes me wonder like Sonic0chick0ames says. Yeah it's true that they could just be ignoring the ocg like they tend to do but we could be getting a 2 for 1 Sin and a new one too. (Just trying to be optimistic here) {{unsigned|70.95.104.165|01:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)}} |
the Oceanic site says “Malefic Blue-Eyes white Dragon”, a brand-new “Blue-Eyes White Dragon” Effect Monster, available for the first time! unlike the american one, here's the link: http://www.yugioh-card.com/oc/products/kaiba.html [[User:Neodaedalus|Neodaedalus]] 04:21, March 18, 2010 (UTC) | the Oceanic site says “Malefic Blue-Eyes white Dragon”, a brand-new “Blue-Eyes White Dragon” Effect Monster, available for the first time! unlike the american one, here's the link: http://www.yugioh-card.com/oc/products/kaiba.html [[User:Neodaedalus|Neodaedalus]] 04:21, March 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
and here's the link in case you need to verify: http://shop.ebay.de/?_from=R40&_trksid=p3907.m38.l1313&_nkw=DPKB&_sacat=See-All-Categories | and here's the link in case you need to verify: http://shop.ebay.de/?_from=R40&_trksid=p3907.m38.l1313&_nkw=DPKB&_sacat=See-All-Categories | ||
− | + | {{Unsigned|174.21.171.57|18:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=== STOP REVERTING IT!!! === | === STOP REVERTING IT!!! === | ||
− | I have proof of all the cards in the spoiler in the talk page right here!!! stop changing it! | + | I have proof of all the cards in the spoiler in the talk page right here!!! stop changing it! {{unsigned|174.21.171.57|19:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)}} |
:Relax. I was only reverted once. It was easy to miss your message above when you didn't mention it in your edit summary. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 19:39, April 13, 2010 (UTC) | :Relax. I was only reverted once. It was easy to miss your message above when you didn't mention it in your edit summary. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] ([[User talk:Deltaneos|talk]]) 19:39, April 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |