Talk:Feral Imp (series)

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Feral Imp (series).
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Ok, now WHY is this being considered for deletion?--火星 WagesWar 19:15, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

They're just 3 cards based off the same imaginary creature. They aren't tied in any other way. We aren't going to make a "Pixie" series if they add a third "Pixie" to "Pixie Knight" and "Sunny Pixie".--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:17, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Except that these three cards are all clearly related, they're all visually similar and all draw their information from the same source, all work well together, and have the distinction of being remakes of the same card.--火星 WagesWar 19:41, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

How do they work well together? They don't look that similar. They have effects that aren't related at all. And they're all just based off of gremlins and are each a different portrayal of a gremlin. Nothing points to them being remakes.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:03, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

All dark, the non-xyz are both level 4, the Xyz is rank 4. Des feral is a Retrained Feral Imp, while King is an XYZ update to DES. Furthermore, while King can't use his effect with the original, DES feral imp applies. Heck, I'd say the three cards are the same monster, in different stages, if I could prove it. --火星 WagesWar 22:32, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

By that reasoning, "Gagaga Magician", "Disk Magician" and "Alchemic Magician" are all related. All DARK Level/Rank 4 monsters who are Magicians. Demolishing that silly argument aside, there's no evidence that links "Feral Imp" and "Des Feral Imp" together. They have different ATKs/DEFs/Types/artworks, as opposed to obviously retrained monsters like "Obnoxious Celtic Guard" and "Swift Gaia the Fierce Knight". And the problem here is that you can't prove it. It's what you believe, fine, but what you believe alone with no evidence has no place on an official page on this Wiki.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:18, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Except that that's just a red herring on my argument. I've already given you several valid reasons as to why this page should stay. You just seem hell-bent on removing it for...well, I don't actually know. What is your reason for being against this so much?--火星 WagesWar 18:31, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

I've given counter arguments to all of your reasons. And I'm not "hell-bent" on anything. You just have a weak argument, that's all.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:01, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

I'm for deleting it too. These "series" pages are getting out of hand. This is a Wiki, series which aren't recognised by the OCG shouldn't have pages. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 19:58, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

I'm putting in my vote for deletion. They have a very loose similarity in appearances, and their effects don't really support each other (or have a theme)... yet. If they do in the future, then I'm all for recreating the page. Waiting for other people's opinions on the matter first though. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 20:00, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

I concur on deleting it. Their Types don't even match. 209.73.151.76 (talk) 23:45, May 1, 2013 (UTC)