User talk:Volkodav

So? What can i do 2 post ANYTHINg, since every little thing i post in this MF page gets deleted...Let me know right away, if u just dont want me 2 post shit, let me know! I just wont ever come back and we will be both tranquil.

First of all, slow down. Second of all, sign your posts with four tilda marks (~). Thirdly, I'm sorry, but a lot of your tips just don't work and fourthly, you shouldn't sign Tips pages with information linking to other areas needlessly. Speedball 03:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

...

ok ill try and improve that but where do i have 2 put the Volkodav 03:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC) ?

at the beginning , end? Maybe every time i post a tip? i dont know...An anyways , you think my tips suck but you let sum dumbass wwrit: this can be put from your deck to your hand with WITCH OF THE BLACK F#@$^N FOREST!!??? WHEN FIRST OF ALL THATS NOT EVEN STRATEGY AND SECOND ITS SOOOOOOOOO BANNED??!!!

So what did u looked up 4 the info on vennominaga? You'll c ur wrong...look im no noob on this game ok? And if im not correct please enlighten me.i know Vennominagas card effect specifies: CANT BE TARGETED BUT, ive seen people do it on sum tournaments and judges accepting it... I usually dio look 4 backup for what i say or write.And with the Alien deck...if i post sum strategies attached to the rest it should be ok right?

If "Offering to the Snake Deity" targets a monster that is unaffected by the effects of Trap Cards, the other cards are still destroyed. http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/yugioh/en/gameplay/faqs/cardfaqs/default.aspx?first=L&last=O

Volkodav 04:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

You'd be right if Venominaga were simply not affected by Trap Cards. However, it cannot be TARGETED, so you can't use it. And the judges that accepted it are wrong, period. There is long history of tournament judges being fucktarded. If you continue to make edits like the ones you are doing, you can be blocked for disruption. Danny Lilithborne 07:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

The Deck page was deleted multiple times by more than one user. The reason was given in one of the delete summaries. In was wrote in review style, first person and refered to your opinion. This is to be avoided, since a review refers to one author's opinion and articles may have multiple authors and users don't own pages per say. Other than that there was no overall Deck strategy. Most of the tips I reverted were where you'd just posted links to the now non-existing page. Royal Decree one was removed for being a tip against the card. Similar tips have been removed before, but after reconsidering, I guess it is valid and it has been re-added. And the (V) you were adding to the end of some tips, I assume was a signature. That was removed for the above reason about multiple people editing the content and nobody owning an article. -- Deltaneos (talk) 09:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok i got it.

Ok i got it, no signatures, pure strategy...and if i cant post sum lil tip, i just wont get mad again.TY guys 4 ur patience.Im kinda of hotheaded srry, I'll do my best just 2 help the page okas?

Volkodav 21:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)