User talk:Deus Ex Machina/Archive8

Also see Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 6, and 7.

Question

What cards can get a field spell from your deck/graveyard? I need help getting a field spell for my cloudian deck

errrr

why is there a large negative nuber by this page on my wachlist?

Thank you

I didn't know if I was using that card correctly and I appreciate you clarifying that for me. Thanks for your help. If you ever stop by Teletraan-I with a transformers question, I'll be sure to return the favor. Xeno the Hedgehog 07:12, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

User's illegal move?

I just noticed one user; Akisa put up two copies of "Red Rose" in her User Page. Is that legal or not? --FredCat100 19:10, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Other members, like you, told them to not post any pictures that are relate to this site, and Akisa did with Red Roses... I am just making sure not get her in trouble for that. --FredCat100 19:21, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, but other member said that's not allow to post any image that is relating to the site. I don't understand why you let her while other don't... --FredCat100 19:43, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

I mean, look at her current talk-page, Trivi-AM told her to not upload the picture in her user page. That's exact what I mean. --FredCat100 19:56, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Alright then, I will go poke Blue since you cannot do anything. --FredCat100 11:57, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

thanks Man

hey thanks man for answer me my question, ah! man if was possible unbanne me I will make contributions Tyrant Slayer Reform me --D@rk Crus@der 03:46, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know what he is talking about either. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:32, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

krty

cheers, the nxt time you're on could you tell me how to access the rulings forum? ty --Blazen8 22:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

problem with userpage

When I try to access my userpage, my browser says "page cannot be found". I don't have this problem when I click "my home", "my talk", etc., so why can't I access my userpage? Xeno the Hedgehog 19:08, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind. I clicked my sig after posting this inquiry, and that worked. Xeno the Hedgehog 19:09, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

...

cheers init..

wait, u said summat about androshpinx and exxod. can u or cant u?

OCG Rulings Help!

Hi Machina! I saw what you are doing here with the OCG rulings and I'm wondering if I can somehow help you! What can I do? I can add some of the old Rulings that are missing. Then you can re-check my changes (from he History page) and correct, or re-write them better (since, unlike me, you can read the Japanese language)! What do you think? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 14:11, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

• Perfect! I'll try to help you as far as I can in order to complete that board with OCG rulings! Thanks! :) ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 07:34, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Hourglass of Courage

"This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF."

I can read this ruling either like Hourglass of Courage doubles its Original ATK to create its new Original ATK, or to create its new current ATK. Souldn't be better if we re-type it like "This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF to create a new current ATK." or something?

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 17:21, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but what I actually wanted to say is that as it is worded right now, someone may get confused with after Hourglass of Courage's effect's resolution its new doubled ATK becomes it Original ATK, or its Currect ATK.

For example someone can read it like: "This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF and its new doubled/halved ATK becomes its new Original ATK." Thus if Megamorph is equipped while Hourglass of Courage has doubled its Original ATK (1100*2=2200 new Original ATK), then its new current ATK will become 4400 (2200*2 its current ATK after Megamorph's resolution).

Also someone can read it like: "This card's effect changes its Original ATK and DEF and its new doubled/halved ATK becomes its new Current ATK." Thus if Shrink is equipped while Hourglass of Courage has doubled its Original ATK (1100*2=2200 new Current ATK), then its new current ATK will become 550 (1100/2 the double to its ATK by its own effect will disappear as a new effect that halves its ATK has affected it).

What do you think! Should we re-write it better, or leave it as it is now? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 20:33, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Ah! Ok then! We can instead inlude it as a note that has the link to the Wikia(J)'s ruling? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 07:44, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Perfect! We can add that as a note. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:09, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Field cards and Monster types

My friend and I had a dispute recently about field cards whose effect states that a monster is treated as a specific type while said field card remains on the field; specifically Zombie World. Hypothetically speaking, when Zombie world is active, are monsters on the field and graveyard treated exclusively as zombie types, or are they treated as zombie types in addition to their default types? Xeno the Hedgehog 02:10, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again! Xeno the Hedgehog 14:03, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Magic Gate

From reading the Japanese effect, can you tell if "??? Magic Gate" requires exactly 2 or 2 more Spellcaster-Type monsters to use? -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:17, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

OCG Rulings: Mentions in Other Rulings!

From what I'm seeing the "Mentions in Other Rulings" have no use for the OCG Rulings since each ruling does not belong especially to a specific card (Unless the "Effect Monster > Kuriboh" rulings), so shouldn't be better if, for example, a ruling that mentions 2 (or more) cards be used as a main Ruling for both cards instead of as main Ruling for the one card, and "Mentions in Other Rulings" ruling for the other?

Or we can place a ruling as "Mentions in Other Rulings" ruling only if a card is mentioned on an "Effect Monster > Kuriboh" ruling, as it happens with Trap of Board Eraser's ruling!

Thoughts?

EDIT: How many times did I said the word "ruling"? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:43, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm...ok! We can place some rulings as "Mentions in Other Rulings" with the criteria you said, at least until we find out a better way to organise them!

Well, I didn't said something in your thread because I wasn't messing up with the OCG Rulings thοse days so I hadn't faced this organisation problem before!

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 00:46, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

dark spirit art vs respect

Dark Spirit Art - Greed .. can it be negated by its own effect if Respect Play is on the field? koaki meru s cannot reveal if respect play is down so....

ty

--Blazen8 19:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Lord of D.

Hi! About the source of the TCG Rulings I thought that we are now placing Netrep, since it survived from its death, and not Yu-Judges anymore (exept for the Judge List Rulings). ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but Netrep is an official source, unlike Yu-Judges. I suggest to use only Netrep (unless for the Judge List Rulings of course). ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:44, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it is not "official"! I think Netrep was UDE's idea to keep a "backup" of the rulings, or something. I still believe that Netrep should be a better idea for the sources! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 11:58, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Ok! Nevermind then! Shouldn't it be better to keep only 1 of those though? ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:16, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

• shrug* ok then! :P ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:24, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

OCG Rulings: Treacherous Gofer

Hello and good day, Sir

May I request for the OCG rulings of Treacherous Gofer to be added? I am interested if the rulings stated anything regarding this card's interaction with Stardust Dragon/Starlight Road

http://yugioh.faq.konami.jp/EokpControl?&lang=en&tid=55842&event=FE0006

Thanks! Nggakboleh 10:47, April 26, 2010 (UTC)