Difference between revisions of "Forum:Breaker vs Sweeper"
(Created page with "{{Forum/header|General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> Um, which of these cards are ...") |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Um, which of these cards are better, [[Lost Blue Breaker]] or [[Deep Sweeper]]? They both need to Tribute themselves to destroy a Spell or Trap Card. One is a Sea Serpent while the other is a Fish. perhaps different supports. [[Special:Contributions/24.83.215.20|24.83.215.20]] ([[User talk:24.83.215.20|talk]]) 05:05, June 24, 2012 (UTC) | Um, which of these cards are better, [[Lost Blue Breaker]] or [[Deep Sweeper]]? They both need to Tribute themselves to destroy a Spell or Trap Card. One is a Sea Serpent while the other is a Fish. perhaps different supports. [[Special:Contributions/24.83.215.20|24.83.215.20]] ([[User talk:24.83.215.20|talk]]) 05:05, June 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Breaker has been known for being used with Diva. But I think Sweeper is better, just because he doesn't have the restriction of having another sea monster. [[User:GMTails|GMTails]] ([[User talk:GMTails|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GMTails|contribs]]) 05:34, June 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Or if you don't really care about the Attribute at all, use a [[Breaker the Magical Warrior]], same attack as Sweeper, but he stays on the field. --<span style="font-family: Monotype Corsiva">-[[User:Dark Ace SP|<span style="color:CornflowerBlue;">Dark </span><span style="color:Blue">Ace SP</span>]] ([[User_talk:Dark Ace SP|<span style="color:MidnightBlue;">Talk</span>]])</span> 14:06, June 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: yeah, but there are some people who like to have a theme Deck, and that they may have multiple supports. [[Special:Contributions/24.83.215.20|24.83.215.20]] ([[User talk:24.83.215.20|talk]]) 21:37, June 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think that "Lost Blue Breaker" is better: it can be searched by "[[Deep-Sea Diva]]" and "[[Mother Grizzly]]" and can be used with "[[Surface]]" and "[[Salvage]]" ("Deep Sweeper" can't). If you're going to Tribute a Fish to destroy a Spell/Trap, "[[Golden Flying Fish]]" and "[[Fish Depth Charge]]" are better options. --[[User:Missign0|Missign0]] ([[User talk:Missign0|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missign0|contribs]]) 17:49, June 27, 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:49, 27 June 2012
Forums: | Index → General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion → Breaker vs Sweeper Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
This forum thread has been unedited for 4373 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
Um, which of these cards are better, Lost Blue Breaker or Deep Sweeper? They both need to Tribute themselves to destroy a Spell or Trap Card. One is a Sea Serpent while the other is a Fish. perhaps different supports. 24.83.215.20 (talk) 05:05, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Breaker has been known for being used with Diva. But I think Sweeper is better, just because he doesn't have the restriction of having another sea monster. GMTails (talk • contribs) 05:34, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Or if you don't really care about the Attribute at all, use a Breaker the Magical Warrior, same attack as Sweeper, but he stays on the field. ---Dark Ace SP (Talk) 14:06, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
- yeah, but there are some people who like to have a theme Deck, and that they may have multiple supports. 24.83.215.20 (talk) 21:37, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
I think that "Lost Blue Breaker" is better: it can be searched by "Deep-Sea Diva" and "Mother Grizzly" and can be used with "Surface" and "Salvage" ("Deep Sweeper" can't). If you're going to Tribute a Fish to destroy a Spell/Trap, "Golden Flying Fish" and "Fish Depth Charge" are better options. --Missign0 (talk • contribs) 17:49, June 27, 2012 (UTC)