Difference between revisions of "Card Trivia:Golden Castle of Stromberg"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
* The effect to Summon one [[Level]] 4 or lower monster per turn is likely the only "real" effect of the original card, as it was the only one [[Leon von Schroeder|Leon]] knew about. The other effects were likely the result of [[Zigfried von Schroeder|Zigfried]]'s hacking.
 
* The effect to Summon one [[Level]] 4 or lower monster per turn is likely the only "real" effect of the original card, as it was the only one [[Leon von Schroeder|Leon]] knew about. The other effects were likely the result of [[Zigfried von Schroeder|Zigfried]]'s hacking.
 
** [[Solomon Muto]] also mentioned about the huge cost to maintain the card on the field. Therefore, sending half of the Deck to the Graveyard or the prohibition of Normal Summoning is most likely also a "real" effect.
 
** [[Solomon Muto]] also mentioned about the huge cost to maintain the card on the field. Therefore, sending half of the Deck to the Graveyard or the prohibition of Normal Summoning is most likely also a "real" effect.
 +
** Due to the fact the Maintenance Cost is a double negative, the only likely hack was the removing of the line saying your opponent must pay the cost, as if the opponent was to pay the cost, the controller of the card would have to half his deck.
  
 
* The real effect for [[Special Summon]]ing monsters is similar to "[[Ancient Fairy Dragon]]'s" effect.
 
* The real effect for [[Special Summon]]ing monsters is similar to "[[Ancient Fairy Dragon]]'s" effect.

Revision as of 20:28, 12 December 2011

  • The effect to Summon one Level 4 or lower monster per turn is likely the only "real" effect of the original card, as it was the only one Leon knew about. The other effects were likely the result of Zigfried's hacking.
    • Solomon Muto also mentioned about the huge cost to maintain the card on the field. Therefore, sending half of the Deck to the Graveyard or the prohibition of Normal Summoning is most likely also a "real" effect.
    • Due to the fact the Maintenance Cost is a double negative, the only likely hack was the removing of the line saying your opponent must pay the cost, as if the opponent was to pay the cost, the controller of the card would have to half his deck.