Difference between revisions of "Forum:Gem Knights"
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:::But instead of what? | :::But instead of what? | ||
:::-[[User:Resk|<span style="color:MediumVioletRed;">Resk</span>]] ([[User_talk:Resk|<span style="color:MediumVioletRed;">✩</span>]])([[Forum:Deck Guide |<span style="color:MediumVioletRed;"> ☯</span>]]) 17:06, October 10, 2011 (UTC) | :::-[[User:Resk|<span style="color:MediumVioletRed;">Resk</span>]] ([[User_talk:Resk|<span style="color:MediumVioletRed;">✩</span>]])([[Forum:Deck Guide |<span style="color:MediumVioletRed;"> ☯</span>]]) 17:06, October 10, 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | I've tested this Deck on DN, and it needs Spell/Trap removal. I was boned by D-Fissure, and I'd probably do about the same against [[Necrovalley]]. [[Special:Contributions/207.233.120.2|207.233.120.2]] ([[User talk:207.233.120.2|talk]]) 17:33, October 10, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 10 October 2011
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Deck Help → Gem Knights Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 4634 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
So I made this deck for DFF
It works alot better than i was expecting <,<
Comments?
-Resk (✩)( ☯) 00:35, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
I thought they wanted Supervise? BF2 Talk Deck Guides 17:22, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope they were fine regardless, they just thought it would be an idea for it,
- And they are happy enough as the deck is awsome :p
- Anyway, anyone have suggestions?
- -Resk (✩)( ☯) 16:58, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Supervise doesn't hurt. I use two and it helps me get free advantage. BF2 Talk Deck Guides 17:00, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
I've tested this Deck on DN, and it needs Spell/Trap removal. I was boned by D-Fissure, and I'd probably do about the same against Necrovalley. 207.233.120.2 (talk) 17:33, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
