Talk:Barian Number

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Barian Number.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

1-4

Are we certain that numbers 1-4 are fake?--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 01:11, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

• Vector himself said that Numbers 1-4 were actually fakes.Over-HundredLegendaryChaosShiningNumbers (talk • contribs) 02:06, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

And in case any of the other questions about this sort of thing, this may be useful for reference: Talk:Rank-Down_Number :) --slave(command) 02:19, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

I realize Vector called them fakes, but wouldn't calling them "Don Thousand Numbers" make more sense? I mean they have a connection with him right? That's what I gather from ep 123. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 13:34, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Both seem equally valid to me, although I would at this point prefer Fake > Don Thousands' because if Don Thousand had an original Number (Such as Vector having Number 66: Master Key Beetle (which thus far isn't an overly important number in the sense of Legendary Numbers)) then that name would be very misleading... So unless a reason for "Don Thousands' Numbers" is better than "Fake Numbers" beyond telling you who is responsible for them...? I think it's better if we leave it how it is... the name as it is isn't inaccurate or misleading (IMHO) --slave(command) 13:46, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

Effects

Dark Illumiknight had the same effect as Illumiknight, so might this be the case with the others? We'll probably have to wait for more info, hence why I put this here.Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 05:15, October 30, 2013 (UTC)