Difference between revisions of "Forum:Tournament Decklists: Yay or Nay?"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Yes)
(Neutral)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
===Neutral===
 
===Neutral===
 +
While I agree that a compendium of decks with a history of success is useful and informative, I feel that it would simultaneously promote cookie-cutting because we give them a complete decklist that has won tournaments, as well as a comprehensive guide on the deck itself. [[User:Jet-Black Nova|Jet-Black Nova]] ([[User talk:Jet-Black Nova|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jet-Black Nova|contribs]]) 01:58, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:58, 29 March 2013


OK. It's been 'usual' policy to not delve too deep into listing Decks used in Tournamnents (specifically, Decklists that are published on Yu-Gi-Oh!-related sites), or Tournaments themselves. However, I think the community should have a say on whether or not we should start to cover the Tournament scene more in-depth i.e. covering actual Tournaments and how players progressed, to potentially covering actual Duelists themselves, and Decks that Duelists have used over the years, up the present.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 01:42, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments below this line

Yes

  • I support it, because there are not many resources on the Internet that keep track of these Decklists. If people wanted to look up old Decklists, it would be great for them to immediately think of the Wiki as a repository of this info. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 01:47, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • I second'd anything Ultimate said. --iFredCat 01:55, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

No

Neutral

While I agree that a compendium of decks with a history of success is useful and informative, I feel that it would simultaneously promote cookie-cutting because we give them a complete decklist that has won tournaments, as well as a comprehensive guide on the deck itself. Jet-Black Nova (talkcontribs) 01:58, March 29, 2013 (UTC)