User talk:FredCat100

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Information from Ultimate Kuriboh

Card Erratas

Could you check the current spoiler list for Battle Pack 2: War of the Giants? A lot of the recently spoiled cards have errata changes (except for the ones at the very bottom, as they don't have pictures yet). And some of these errata changes might be subtle, like "Dark Valkyria". The solution? "to" --> "then" --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 04:18, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, must had missing it - half-sleepy at that time I reverted it. --iFredCat 10:04, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
You still sleepy? Could you check the rest of the errata pages of the cards going to be released in Battle Pack 2? --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 20:30, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
My mind does, but not my instinct. And soon, I will - I am eating dinner now. --iFredCat 21:03, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
That must be an incredibly long dinner. When you're finished eating, perhaps Card Errata:Phantom Beast Rock-Lizard too? --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 01:14, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
Oh, sorry - seemed like I got trapped in Time Frame for 24 hours. But yea, I done it just now. And fixed Phantom Beast Rock-Lizard as you done spoke it. Also, I completed all other cards that was listing in Battle Pack 2. --iFredCat 01:21, May 27, 2013 (UTC)

Card Artworks

"Hero Ring". --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 23:40, May 24, 2013 (UTC)

Done and done. --iFredCat 00:01, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Call of the Haunted's Errata

There were a change between "the" and "that" =). Btw, how to undo any edite, I just try it but nothing happen!! --Dlamash (talkcontribs) 15:16, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Fixed - I understand that it's hard to do the undo and stuffs. First, click on History of that article, and click on "Undo" of the first line of all those edits and you can revert it back to normal. But be sure to remember that it don't work with old edits (second or below). And you can also undoing almost all edits that was vandalism or such to not be there, select the blue dot on left (which was lower than the one on right) then click "Compare select revisions" then click on "Undo" on the right details, that will reverting all way back to the one you wish to "reset" the page back to normal, but again, any old version (the one with right dot) wouldn't give you permission to do that as well.
TL:DR; Let's do this in steps...
Step 1 -
(cur | prev) [Dot here] [Dot here] 11:09, June 10, 2013‎ (Talk)‎ . . (1,035 bytes) (+244)‎ . . (undo)
Step 2 - Click (undo) at end of the line up above, then review anything you wanted it to be and also you can editing it in your own way to perfect it. The Edit Box is just below the details of "Latest View" and "Your View" (if it was long list, then scroll down if you have to)
Step 3 - Once you are settle with the current edit, be sure to preview it before go ahead and "save" the page (I often made mistake with <del></del> and <ins></ins> over time) to see if it's perfectly good for you to save it.
For long load of vandalism (multiple edits, etc.), then do this step instead
Step 1 - Just similar same to above, but be sure to look at two blue dots (identify to "multiple answer choice dot", you got the draft); there are many empty dots below the lit one. You can select one of them to set the "Compare select revisions".
Step 2 - Click on "Compare Select Revisions" above the whole list of user edits, which will bring you to the same result as you were "undoing" the page, but with compare difference instead.
Step 3 - If you're make a right choice, then you can click on (undo) next to the vandalism version (on right), and it will magically switch the position of both selections that you chose.
Step 4 - Do same as Step 2 and 3 in single Undo above, and if you are satisfy with it, Preview it and Save it after you clean it up.
--iFredCat 16:53, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks fred Fred, that was very useful. --Dlamash (talkcontribs) 18:38, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. Tried my best to tutor you how - and no one even teaching me to do that. --iFredCat 18:39, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

Jester Lord


Sorry, I sincerely hope I didn't piss you off! ={

I knew I removed that trivia point earlier but ChaosGallade "reminded" me that per policy on this Wikia, card effect-related trivia is no longer needed unless it is intentional. (i.e. "Primal Seed" and the brand-new "Chaotic Seed", which is an intentional relationship.) I've seen similar reverts from other users regarding this some time ago and while I don't know the exacts about those, I do know that if that's the case, then what ChaosGallade told me WAS IN FACT, true. Hence, I dropped the point from "Jester Lord" in question because those appeared to only be similar card effects WITHOUT other relationships. The policy makes sense if you ask me, given the fact that as more booster sets come out with brand new cards, the pool of similar effects (whether intentional or not) will continue to inflate.

Again I'm sorry, I DO NOT wanna cause any trouble with anyone here!! --ARCADIASSCHOLARLY 16:53, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

I only ask if you wish to remove that obviously and pointless trivia, then throw the line that included "Krebons" out as well. They both are known as pointless and too obviously to know the difference. But if you only wish to remove one line, then stop be silly and go erase other line as well. Last line in that Trivia is just perfectly fine to me - which is very important whilst the first two are not. --iFredCat 16:57, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the response, I suppose I'm glad that there's no hard feelings (I hope...)

You know, I think the Trivia point regarding "Krebons"'s pose could be an exception, albeit NOT the rule, as I have just got done scrutinizing both card's artworks and their poses do in fact, look very similar. I mean, I haven't seen reverts regarding similar artworks before but I guess in theory, the same could go for card artworks too, even though the sky is WAY more the limit with card artworks than card effects (in other words, odds of the pool of similar artworks in the near future increasing are probably MUCH LESS than seeing similar card effects later because that is the beauty of art--variety!! =3 )

Nevertheless, I'll remove the "Krebons" point anyway, especially if you insist--at "worst," this Wikia is SO DAMN powerful that we can all revert edits @ will!! --ARCADIASSCHOLARLY 17:15, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

It's unnecessary to create new topic while they both are in same discussion - so deleted "second topic". I am aware that they possessed the same position, but that's nonsense anyways, like you said. --iFredCat 17:18, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

Warrior version of Felgrand

Shhhh FredCat. No worries, only dreams now. (Just leave the issue alone. I'm involving myself in stuff that I understand and leaving myself out of stuff I don't. As such, I know his alt IP was banned, but they have a valid point regarding the rename.) --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 22:02, June 17, 2013 (UTC)

My User Page I'm sorry but could you please explain more on what you meant by 'it's not allowed'. I didn't make unnecessary page here that can create confusion, it's still part of my profile page on this wikia. It's always fine in all other wikias e.g.
ː̖́(" `з´),/ \,(`ε´ ҂)ː̗̀ HighFive! 04:45, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Chaos Numbers

Oh, haven't seen that. I am sure there are some places that have to make that change. Still, I appreciate the concern. Energy X 14:57, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring

Fred, stop edit warring with the ZEXAL allusions, now. Aside from editing warring, you're also wrong. Most of those aren't allusions. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 03:08, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

That's last time I am going to do that - Also I warned him for being "stubborn". But yea - some of them might wrong, however I found them still standing. --iFredCat 03:09, June 21, 2013 (UTC)


I've had enough of "Fiber Jar" rulings for now; kinda tired regarding that. Apparently, "Dream Clown" targets[1]. And no, "Blue-Eyed Maiden" will not negate the attack (based on "E-HERO Wildheart" + "Scrap-Iron Scarecrow"). --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 18:29, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Response to your own messages

FredCat, I read the message you dropped to my talk page.

I told in the line you saw that it says "good 4 rabbit, bad 4 hedgehog". As "rabbit" i told about the Dino Rabbit Deck, which is based on Rescue Rabbit since Imperial Iron Wall makes that deck useless, so it is good if you face the Dino Rabbits, right?

Also, tell to the other admins right here in the wiki that I will be the official Greek card translator. I come from Greece and I knew about the channel quite recently and I am excited about this.

NickTheGreekLover (talkcontribs) 15:17, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

We don't really have an official Greek translator, as this is a free and open wiki for anyone to edit. But feel free to contribute as much as possible. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 15:29, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Erratum Article

Thanks, I read some of it, but I guess I really needed to read the entire thing. I understand your formula now, or at least most of it. --Dark Ace SP (Talk) 15:06, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

Condition Effects

Read Condition Effect. It says that Road Synchron's effect is not a Continuous. Any effect that applies continuously while in the Graveyard is a Condition. That's why all Geminis' first effects are Conditions, since they apply in the Graveyard. ReadjustPurge (talkcontribs) 20:56, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

Officially these are referred to as "This effect has no classification" effects. They are similar to Continuous Monster Effects as they do not activate (start a chain) when they are applied, so cards that negate activations like "Divine Wrath" and "Debunk" cannot be used against them. However unlike Continuous Monster Effects they can be applied while the card is not face-up on the field, such as in the hand and Graveyard, or in the case of the "Multiple Tributers", while face-down on the field as well.

If "Dark Ruler Ha Des" destroys "Grapha, Dragon Lord of Dark World" by battle, "Grapha" cannot use its Special Summoning Condition to Special Summon itself from the Graveyard.

"Special Summoning Conditions" such as "Cyber Dragon", "Machina Fortress", "Grapha, Dragon Lord of Dark World" and "Familiar-Possessed - Aussa". "Only 1 on field restrictions" (There can only be 1 face-up ___ on the field) However, note if "Skill Drain" is negating the effect of a face-up "Malefic Truth Dragon" on the field, you still cannot Summon another "Malefic" monster, since its effect is still active while it is in the hand. "Only 1 per side restrictions" (You can only control 1 ___) Similar to the above restriction, you cannot Summon another copy if "Skill Drain" is negating the one on the field. "Substitute Effects" such as "Destiny Hero - Departed" (... remove it from play instead) and Union Monsters (... destroy this card instead) "Material Costs": "Multiple Tributers" such as "Kaiser Sea Horse" and "Double Coston" "Ritual Substitutes" such as "Ritual Raven" and "Djinn of Rituals" "Fusion Substitute Monsters" such as "Beastking of the Swamps" and "Mystical Sheep #1" "Multiple Card-Types" such as "Simorgh, Bird of Ancestry" (This card is treated as a Normal Monster while in your hand.) and "Light and Darkness Dragon" "Match Winners" such as "Victory Dragon" "Graveyard Conditions" such as "Phantom Beast Cross-Wing", "Harpie Queen" and "Elemental HERO Necroshade" "Level Treat Effects" such as "Tuningware" and "Road Synchron"

Since you're too lazy to read, here it is. And yes, some Conditions can be negated by Skill Drain, but they're still conditions. ReadjustPurge (talkcontribs) 20:59, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. There are Conditions that can and cannot be negated. Read the Condition Effect page. ReadjustPurge (talkcontribs) 21:03, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
There are Conditions that can and cannot be negated. The Condition Effect page mentions which can't and can be negated. Also, Grapha's Summoning condition can be negated. Read the rulings! ReadjustPurge (talkcontribs) 21:05, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

I think we've given you enough chances

We seem to keep having this discussion, and nothing, not even a temporary ban has convinced you to amend your ways. You have been given more chances than most other users would have had, and I feel that's been incredibly generous given your past behaviour. I am faced with no alternative but to issue you with a ban of significant length: 6 months; you are disruptive, dismissive of opinions different to yours, and incredibly condescending to your fellow users. We have tried to convince you to reform, but this appears to have been ignored. I want this to be crystal clear: This is your final warning. If your behaviour hasn't changed after your six month break, we will consider permanent exclusion. You are also not to use your talk page to draw attention to spam or vandalism, either.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 23:32, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

I am listening to ATEM's opinion about the effect rulings. I told that user to wait until ATEM answer. But fine, destroy me all you want, TTF, I stop cared. --iFredCat 23:35, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
The ban was not just to end the current dispute and I am sorry that it came to this. The ban wasn't purely his decision either.
You have been rude to other users a lot. This includes shouting at users, who make mistakes or don't understand how things work here and being disrespectful to the views users who are trying to suggest changes, you disagree with or don't understand. This can be very discouraging to the other users and cause them to quit over simple misunderstandings, because of how they've been treated.
TwoTailedFox did warn you about this recently and you have had similar warnings and bans in the past.
I do hope you will continue to edit after the six months. We'd rather not lose you as an editor, but your attitude to other users is a problem that has to be dealt with.
-- Deltaneos (talk) 23:47, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindly word, Delta. But he made a mistake - He should have to listening and resolving the problem by talking through it. I am aware that I had been warning before and I am still cool-headed through that conflict. But now, I take my words base on him back, he's a jerk, more than Blue. Banning the defensive user on the sight, eh? I would be happy to sacrifice my damn Mover Right to reduce the block expiry time to one month instead. If I have being blocking permanent on next ban, then what's a point of have me as a Mover if I can't moving any shit?
I was right, also that new user is right, but he and I are also wrong on that Gemini Effects - It is Continuous AND Condition at same time; so why not put them as Continuous/Condition instead of back and forth between those two effect rulings?
My last ban was only a week, but now six months? What. The. Fuck. Sneaky Fox? --iFredCat 01:20, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
Not trying to butt in at all, but please mind your language Fred. Shardsilver (talkcontribs) 01:33, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
Nope, I already lost my faith on him - the Founder of this site. He crushed me like nothing, and I am certain that he's NOT a God of anything. If he want me gone, take the right of Mover from me already and just lock me up permanent. I stopped care of what happening to me being a user in here. I can admit that he's an asshole and arrogant Admins around here, way more than Blue. All I done was to defending the Effect Rulings and what I got from him; a ban! All that for nothing. So fuck off. --iFredCat 01:38, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
And, TTF, it's my talk page and it can have my own law here, as long as I am unscathed (half-blocked) - I can do anything and everything with this talk page. If you want me to stop "trolling" and "spamming" it, just go ahead and block my right to the maximum - and taking away my Mover Right as well. If you do not, then you're a coward, coward as a yellow belly chicken! You already lost my trust and my faith with this stupidity block reason - Six months of banning and next ban; "permanent"? Nope, I don't care if I take many chances. That's a life - yes, you got fired from the jobs many times, and you still went to get job for money, derp. I still trusted ATEM and UltimateKuriboh when coming to the rulings; not you. I am aware that you're a Founder, but you're also a person, a mortal person - not God. I know you had a good reason, but at bad timing and make up a wrong length of block. I am sure you will regret losing a best user, like me, to the hell if you chose to ignoring my rants, chose to be a law and be an arrogent person. Once my "Mover" right is removed, I will retiring from this site, from what I had put all my efforts in this site and I will shred all connect with you, you two tailed bastard. --iFredCat 02:06, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
@Shard, don't bother try to persuade that coward - he think that his power is his absolute. Any choice he made is his final. --iFredCat 02:29, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
Fred, you can not put all the blame on TTF. Several admins discussed it and came to the agreement that something had to be done due to your behavior, me being one of them. Whether intentional or not, the way you talk to people is harassing. You jump into conversations all the time and try as you might, you rarely really help. And things have been getting worse these past few months; several of us have noticed. We view you as a friend and you've made so many positive contributions here, so we don't want you gone forever. Moving rights have nothing to do with anything right now. We have given you one final chance, because we really think you mean well here. In 6 months, please return, but you'll need to not get into heated debates, and be more open to ideas and change regarding the site. --Golden Key (talkcontribs) 02:39, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
Screw that - I stopped care, Goldy. Either he hurled his ass back and fixing the limitation or just let me gone for good. I still control my own talk page so I can put my law here - if you don't want me to continue doing that, just block my edits whole. And also, like I said before, I already lost my faith on that fucking bastard - TwoTailedFox - as he is more of asshole, higher than Blue. So leave me waste in the hell or pull me back in. Good luck. --iFredCat 02:48, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
Though you cannot respond because you've been blocked from editing your talk page, I'm letting you know that you should save anything from your sub-user pages that you want to keep. Policy is to delete such pages when a user is banned. You have 24 hours. --Golden Key (talkcontribs) 12:47, July 2, 2013 (UTC)