User talk:FredCat100/Archive 10

RE: H. Mirror...

1. It's not my image.
2. I considered that it was fake for a while, but there was no way for anyone to get the monster image of that quality, unless it was from one of those official sites. I was going to ask User:Blackwings0605 about it after he comes back (since he knows a lot of those sites).
3. It's nothing like T.G. Christmas Angel, as this card was actually shown in the 5Ds anime. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 11:53, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Flip =/= Activate?

When you flip a face-down Trap Card with a quick-like effect, like Phantom Hand, you do not have to apply its effect as well at that moment. But it is still the activation of a Trap Card, so even if you choose not to apply also its effect but just activate the card (flip it face-up), cards like Dark Bribe can still be chained and negate the activation of the card. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:07, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Lack of Picture Gallery

Err, I'm not sure what are you asking, but I don't know much about those things. Try to talk to Deltaneos or Falzar as they know better these stuff and they may help you. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 14:28, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea, really. I work only to the Rulings. I'm not watching what's going on to the Gallery pages, ect. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 14:40, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE: {{:LV Monster Rulings}}

We already have Rulings for LV monsters. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:40, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

I just stopped in the middle of Armed Dragon LV3's Rulings since I was in a hurry and wanted to leave. I'll fix it soon! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:45, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Great job! Thanks! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:05, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Ok! You're welcome! :) ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:10, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Ignition Effect Question Recycle & 14 out of 14 Forums got Unsigned...

I'll update the FAQs section soon; along with a few other things.

Probably not possible. But we could add an edit notice. Regular talk pages already have them, but not forums, but then again, it's in the header so anyone who would ignore the header would probably ignore the edit notice too. Unless we make the edit notice really stand out *cough*size 72 red font bold underlined*cough*; and even still there will be people who will ignore it. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:09, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

De-Fusion Question

So... what happens if you activate defusion on this guy? — This unsigned comment was made by 119.224.33.76 (talk • contribs) 11:10, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

If you had a part-full field, you can revive the same Fusion Material Monsters to the field, fill up the field with them and leave (whatever number remains of Materials) in the Graveyard. Or if Falzar or dest disagreed with this, then I would say that you cannot do this while the field is part-full (as you have 1-4 monsters on your side of the field, and you de-fused fifth monster - F.G.D). Same reason for the Fusion Monster had Fusion Sub, you still De-Fusion and Special Summon the Fusion Substitution back to the field along with it original partner(s). --FredCat 11:19, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

If you use it on your own Five-Headed Dragon: Card Rulings:De-Fusion, the one on Chimeratech Overdragon says otherwise.

Note that you can only Special Summon them if all of the Fusion Materials are in YOUR OWN Graveyard, regardless of who controlled Five-Headed Dragon. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 11:29, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, good thing that the ruling article you mentioned is still legal enough. Wouldn't that been same monster if my opponent fused when I de-fused it in my control? --FredCat 11:31, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Need to report harassment/vandalism

BobaFett was getting into a flame war with me over his "changes" to a few of my decks, refusing to listen to me when I explained to him why I wouldn't go for a few of his suggestions, and even reversed my edits to get rid of the natter after it was clear it was going to become a flame war. Now he's insisting he's "helping" me and not a vandal while continuing to undo my work on my own threads. I've told him multiple times, now, to leave me alone, but he refuses. Where can I go to report him? SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 13:17, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

I saw that coming, Synjo, but you're also cause the problem. So report would be my responsible for this minute, and I want you both to deal the problem civilian and polite, instead of argue like two babies that cry over a spill milk. I had deal with this before - I had some fight with GrouchMan (User:GrouchMan) for his reason, but now he and I are friends, due to respect and peace. --FredCat 13:22, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me Fred, but I didn't change his deck. I made my own version of it and he rejected it saying that I was elitist etc.BobaFett2 (talk)

That's what I did. I made a new section with a new deck template and posted my version.BobaFett2 (talk)

Also, I've been attempting to be polite and explain to him that I'm not being elitist.BobaFett2 (talk)

No, he moved the forums after getting rid of my versions. My version is Jackal Lockdown V.1.2 V.BF2.BobaFett2 (talk)

He made some suggestions, and I did indeed reject them, but I didn't start with the elitist stuff until he started pressing the issue; he suggested I cut down the deck to 40 cards, I explained to him that I'm more comfortable dueling with a 50 card deck, and he refused to accept that; he told me to get rid of Uruz due to it being a "-1 advantage", I calmly explained my reasons for using it (I believe it's better than Winged Sage Falcos, since it doesn't require the opponent's monster to be in a certain battle position to bounce it), and that I didn't believe in the "-1 advantage" stuff, and he refused to drop it; He insisted I put in an extra deck with Black Rose and Stardust Dragons, I told him I don't like putting extraneous synchros into a deck that doesn't need them, and he continued to insist. It wasn't until the back and forth bordered on a flame war that I deleted the entire conversation, and listed my reasons as such, and in response he undid the deletion and started harassing me about how he was in the right. I told him several times to leave me alone, at first calm but then more forceful when he refused to take the hint. I tried to work with him, explaining why I didn't accept some of his offers, and he refused to drop it and move on to something else. THAT is why I say he's an elitist and a vandal and harasser; I did everything I could to calmly resolve this situation, but he pressed the issue just to get his point across and force me to admit he was right. So if anything, he's the one who needs to be reported for this, not me. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 13:48, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

I never insisted on Stardust of Black Rose. I said that they'd help (simply another option). I didn't continue to insist upon the advantage, I just said that the deck size trick was mathematically proven.BobaFett2 (talk)

He did insist on Stardust and Black Rose after I told him I didn't think the deck needed synchros, and he did continue the advantage argument after I explained to him my reasons for using Uruz. Check the history if you don't believe me. And I don't give a damn if the deck limit is "mathematically proven" to him, it isn't to me; I've tried working decks with that low of a card limit, and I always find myself getting decked out without fully implementing the deck's strategy. 50 is my "Goldilocks number", and he refuses to accept that and work with that. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 13:53, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I did say that you should put them in and gave my reasons, but then you started calling me stuff and that's the flaming part.BobaFett2 (talk)

Hey, relax the fire! Is this article for argument? --FredCat 13:54, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

No problem Fred, I'll go edit some galleries.BobaFett2 (talk)

I understand and respect that he was trying to help me. My beef was less that I didn't agree with his suggestions, but that he kept on pushing the issue of me implementing them when I already gave my reasons for disagreeing with them. When he started with that, it was becoming clear that it was basically talking to a brick wall and that any more discussion would just lead to a flame war, hence my deletions, and the last straw was when he undid those deletions - it seemed like he was just trying to get me to give up and agree with his "suggestions", at that point. Now that it's over, though, if he doesn't fall into that same pit, I'm willing to give him another chance to give advice; all I ask is that, when I say no and give my reasons, that should be the end of it. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 14:22, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Unofficial Lore is failure.

That's what the tracking categories are there for. ;) 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 01:02, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

That's very quite nice... Then why the hell is English Unofficial Lore came back if it was removed before? --FredCat 10:55, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Orca

Can you look at my Orca deck again?

Orca Firepower

--Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:04, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I asked you again, because I value options. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, actually I've been here since 2010, but I had to create a new account, and I didn't know how to do that until now, so thanks. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:28, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Think you misunderstood me, my bad, I had an account here once User:Skyhawk01, but I forgot my password, so I just created a new account. Plus I like my new user name better. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:34, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

All I had was decklists, and I already moved them. I made the mistake of deleting my talk page stuff, now I archive them.--Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:37, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I already have a section labeled Archives on my talk, and created the archive, but I don't know how to make the boxes and stuff, I've looked it up, but I get confused. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:40, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

I got confused, so can you help me do it? And second I have a section labeled Archives on my talk page with a link that says /Archive1. Any help would be appreciated. --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 15:53, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

What can I say? Amazing, and thanks, so much! --Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 18:16, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Card Rulings:Precious Cards from Beyond

The Ruling page has been updated. There is no need to have categories like "Traditional Format Rulings", ect, just because the ruling mentions a Forbidden Card. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 20:41, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: In the Name of Black...

It has been fixed now! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:01, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Wisel still have the Infinity... Round 2

I didn't exactly say there was supposed to be an infinity symbol on the TCG card, I just that the latest official name had an infinity symbol, which does not necessarily be true in the TCG. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:22, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Trivia...

What I'm saying is that it would make no sense for a Japanese YGO card to name itself after an English Pokemon name. It's not likely that whoever designed the card is aware of what Pokemon names are changed to in localization. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:09, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Card Rulings:Debunk

It has been updated! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:14, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Yes they are! Check Konami's TCG Gameplay section in the official site. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:21, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

It is better to have links at least to the cards. The repeated link doesn't matter. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:45, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Having links to the same card in all Rulings helps to many things. For example, "Debunk"'s 4th Ruling mentions the card "Imperial Iron Wall". So it belongs in the "Mentions in Other Rulings" category in Card Rulings:Imperial Iron Wall under the "TCG Rulings" section as well. If it doesn't have link for Debunk, then people cannot see what that Debunk card is unless they search it in the Search Box. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 05:36, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Over Freakin' Link

Glad I made someone laugh, thanks. And keep up your own good work too. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:29, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: EXVC Update Pack Picture...

seems like a bigger picture from shriek is already up. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 23:47, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't notice it before either. I guess they released a few before they realised that it was inappropriate. It's already on the Artworks page though. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 11:29, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Noting the artwork change on the card should be enough. There shouldn't really be a need to say it was also done on the pack image. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:43, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it's because I misread it. Thought you meant adding it to the Artworks page.

Yes, I agree on updating the image to the newest one. But I'm not sure if we should separate the file and comment on Konami's mistake. And at that, maybe find a better quality version of the image as well. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:53, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

It's a side effect from multi-tasking while multi-tasking. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

I know. Everyone makes mistakes now and then. I'm just overworked atm so more mistakes than usual. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:47, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Snowman...

Sorry about that; I mistaked 2 for 4; I also said +/- "make corretion where needed." in the Edit Summary when I was editing that card.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 13:07, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Which "notice"?--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 13:18, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

You mean realizing errors from... rite"--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 13:27, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Everyone makes mistake somewhere, Someone forgot to put "Strategy of the Dark" in "Devil's Gate..." (Rite above "Dark Bribe").--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 13:32, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

I guess that's rare.--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 13:36, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:

I'm talking about images, not normal pages. --BobaFett2 (talk)

Actually, Falzar is an administrator.Yu-Gi-Oh!:Administrators --BobaFett2 (talk)

RE: Overhaul

• Well, the page is meant to document "card evolutions". A lot of the cards listed are just cards that happen to share similar effects with other cards, not necessarily evolutions of them. It was getting too ridiculous when some idiot decided that Judgment Dragon, Black Rose Dragon and Levia-Dragon are all somehow related in the evolutionary line. The ones that were removed were the ridiculous ones, and the redundant ones (such as Speed Spells, which are not a downgrade, but rather the exact same Spell in Speed Spell form.) I have permission from Deltaneos, as well. If you disagree with certain ones, then you can say so on the talk page.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 20:18, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Banlist Reasons

Abbreviations (or anything where individual letters are said) should be preceded by "an", not "a". BobaFett2 (talk)

Actually, whether "an" or "a" gets put before an abbreviation depends on the same rules as for normal words - if the abbreviation starts with a vowel sound ("FTK" - pronounced "eff-tea-kay", "OTK" - pronounced "oh-tea-kay"), then you should use "an" before it. However, if it starts with a consonantal sound ("BEWD" - pronounced "bee-ee-double-you-dee", "DM" - pronounced "dee-em"), it should be preceded with "a". Basing this off of pronunciation, rather than spelling, is also why you can take an hour to read about a unicorn. ;) 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 04:40, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

I got what he meant... It's just Abbreviate Part that caused the letter difference. You should go see what I answered in his talk page. --FredCat 10:22, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, no. I've looked this stuff up (along with being a grammar expert) and it's always preceded by "an" if it's an abbreviation (unless it's also a word, eg: "radar").BobaFett2 (talk)

You must speak a different dialect of English than me, then, because what I wrote above is the way I was taught and how I've always heard it. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 04:05, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

I may be wrong about "B" or other such letters.BobaFett2 (talk)

Hey, you both, get off my talk page! This ain't your forum or your own talk page. If you wanna discuss about the way of how to using A/An letter, just discuss at Dino's or your own, Boba! --FredCat 14:02, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

And Boba... care to explain this part of quote I found in Why the Hell not? - Obviously, when there are legitimate concerns, I oppose a user. --FredCat 15:23, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

More rudeness...and I have no idea what you are talking about now.BobaFett2 (talk)

I am asking about the Vowel using on the vowel. Like you said about Abbreviation - except that it's a user. --FredCat 17:43, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

That's because User sounds like "yuser".BobaFett2 (talk)

Interesting... and sorry about my short-fuse earlier. It was my way to get your attention, but now at least I know better than this. --FredCat 17:47, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Card Errata

No problem buddy, we're here as a team, to help each other anyway. Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 14:08, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

I'll see what i can do, I'm currently working on Flaming Eternity. I want to make disapear every single red link as well as clarify every galery in every languages and make every pages of every card of this set perfect... And I tell you, it's a lot of work haha! Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 14:13, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Celri, Monk of Dark World

Note that this card hasn't been released yet, so the answer may differ depending to its actual text's translation!

According to it's current translation, if Celri, Monk of Dark World is discarded by a card's effect to the Graveyard and then Special Summoned to your opponent's side of the field with its first effect, then its second effect will activate and you (the owner) must discard 1 card from your hand.

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:34, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Let's better wait for the card to be released so we can be sure for the answer. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:44, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Sounds good to me! :) ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:46, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Card Errata talk:Blade Knight

I left a little message for you there regarding the Dark Begining and Dark Revelation series. All these sets only contains reprinted cards so it's never the original lore. Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 20:15, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not saying that there is only 1 reprinted lore. The CP06 isn't the 1st errata but actually the second ;) Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 20:18, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Nop, not yet. The text you left is the DB2 text wich is not the same text of the CT1 ;). There is actually The original lore: CT1/ Then DB2 is the second lore and the 3rd lore is the CP06! Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 20:24, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Re:This is NOT Trivia

Wow, sorry. I was referring to the text that I removed, not the edit that you did. Samurai Bruxo^{Discussão/Talk} 23:08, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Road Warrior or Road Fighter?

They're doing it to avoid any chance of getting sued for copyright by makers of the movie or by WWE for the tag team. Apparently Konami wasn't nearly as worried about that when they released the card in the TCG. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:24, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

About you.

I was just wondering what is your first language and where are you from? Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 14:01, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Oh sorry Fred, I didn't know. My apologies. By the way, keep up the good work on the Errata section! Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 14:07, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

RE A Tradução!

Não entendi ... sua mensagem ... Toad Sage (talk • contribs) 14:16, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry if I bothered you. Toad Sage (talk • contribs) 14:16, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

There isn't a correct/official name for it, since it wasn't released in portuguese. Anyways, its name (Before I changed) was so wrong that it hurt my eyes. Toad Sage (talk • contribs) 14:32, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Number 17

I got it from how it sounds; "Ribaisu"; R=L; b=v; su= s or th. (Revise and Leviath)'s last 2 letters (se, th) are sound very close. That's Y for me it doesn't matter which name is chosen--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 00:43, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Removing Redirects

It sounds like you know what you're doing in this scenario, so you can remove the redirect from "Amazoness Trainee"'s page. Also, could you look at the page for Leo and give your opinion on the editing war? I believe the last person to edit it was the unregistered user from before. Golden Key (talk • contribs) 23:22, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Done --Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 23:31, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me Fred? Was that humor? I just deleted the useless redirect and came here to tell it, that's it. Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 23:34, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Leo's bio.

Listen I'm sorry how bad of a start we got off to. Since you won't agree with what i'm saying than why don't we talk it over. That unregisterd user does have a good point. Now I didn't edit Luna's bio because there isn't enough evidence so I left hers like it is. With this being said will you please allow me to put that in his bio(i'm still new to this, and i'm sorry if I acted immature, but I was only stating a fact). Will you allow me to do so(I will not put anything else in, trust me).Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:53, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Although I asked on another page i'm not sure if your messege only responds to the ones on your talk page so I figured i'd ask here as well. Do you know where I can talk to cheesedude about this?Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 00:05, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Machina Gadget

I won't say that Cyber Dragon is a Machina Gadget staple, but I think it's a very good card and fully worthy of being listed as recommended. Nobody- seems to think otherwise, and I would like to hear his reasoning. Lappyzard (talk • contribs) 00:53, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Can we discuss this further on the Machina Gadget talk page? I think a public debate would be more beneficial. Lappyzard (talk • contribs) 01:01, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. Lappyzard (talk • contribs) 01:15, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Again, please discuss this in Talk:Machina Gadget. And can you explain what you mean by "Not at all." ? Lappyzard (talk • contribs) 01:34, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

My mistake, sorry. It's not a phrase I've heard very often. Lappyzard (talk • contribs) 01:52, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Edit Number

Yeah I don't get it neither... It might count the edits I made that were later deleted? I don't know. Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 23:50, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Oh so that's why you were talking about the hedgedog, I didn't get it yesterday haha. Na he's not but yeah, I'm quite fast and I read every new edit when I'm here! Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 23:55, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Those two are same one

No problem, I just noticed it looking at the changes to the page - Silver Glaceon @ 21:53, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

That's usually how I find things to edit or undo - Silver Glaceon @ 22:03, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Armed Samourai - Ben Kei

Don't worry buddy. In the Image policy, dashes are not allowed in files names. I'm changing the whole FET cards galleries, including Ben Kei. First I update every link pages to the right names, then I rename the files so don't worry, in a few minutes, there will not be red links anymore ;) Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 19:23, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

I know what I'm doing Fred, don't worry. I work with this page. It's very usefull because it list every images that starts with the name I want, even the images that are not linked anywhere in the wiki. I'm doing it the best way don't worry ;) Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 19:28, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

Dude, the work is done at the end, so can I please work like i want to do? I'm more confortable the way I'm doint it, I know exactly what page link to what image and I've always been working like that. I've just edited the errata page once and now, no more red link. There is no difference at the end so what's the problem? Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 19:33, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Shoot up the Mons... I mean of Spell/Trap Monster card...

No it cannot! Monsters in the Spell & Trap Card Zone are treated as Spell Cards, not monsters. They can be destroyed by De-Spell but they cannot be targeted by Compulsory Evacuation Device. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 00:05, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

RE: T.G. Christmas Angel

haha, so she had nothing to do with Christmas after all. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 11:59, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

What picture(s) was this? Now you've got me curious... =D 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 07:20, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

The original is File:Tech Genus X-mas Angel.jpg and FredCat's YGO card maker translation is here. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 08:22, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

All this made me looking at wrong topic for some reasons. But yes, Falzar got it correct, I moved the only picture to that article due to the fact that my own CardTable2 won't work when I tried to upload the outside link there. --FredCat 10:42, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Aah, interesting... and I see it was GlowUpBulb (talk • contribs) who was fighting for its inclusion; as I recall, he's given us trouble at other times as well, though the quality of his contributions do seem to have improved. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 16:14, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed... after some hard beaten on his head, it finally get in his hard-head for good reason. --FredCat 17:30, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

XYZ WTF FAKE CARD!

O... k... First of all: Don't call me an idiot.
Second: I FOUND the pictures on INTERNET... How could i know they're real or fake? I mean, HOW would someone make one of these with BLACK BACKGROUND
And third: Trueman's english voice IS Dan Green... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Green_%28voice_actor%29#Anime.2FAnimation
So, seriously, calm down... I don't care if you're an admin here, just... calm down... Tripodnumberone (talk ● contribs) 17:44, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Trueman have no English voice actor. Season 4 was never dubbed. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:55, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

That's true, however that name was listed in the link where Tripodnumberone confirmed. --FredCat 19:59, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

That's from Wikipedia, and no source was given on the wikipedia page. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:10, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Fine, dammit! Enough with your coffee today, Coffeedude! --FredCat 20:11, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Divine -> Ark

I'd love to do that, but it's not going to happen. The difference here is that just because the building is called the "Divine Temple" in the dub, does not mean that the arc will be called the same. In fact, they usually choose different arc names (or split the arcs up further). The arc shouldn't be renamed until it has an dub name. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:34, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Arcanite Question

Dest was right. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 22:48, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

When Arcanite Magician is Synchro Summoned her Trigger Effect to gain 2 Spell Counters activates and starts a chain. At that time players can respond to the Summon with cards like Bottomless Trap Hole, ect, in chain to Arcanite Magician's effect. But since her ATK is only 400 at that time (until her effect resolves) Bottomless Trap Hole cannot be chained. And when her effect resolves and she gains the Counters and the +2000 ATK, it will be too late to activate Bottomless Trap Hole at that time as the respond to the Summon window has closed. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:51, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Humor thing again

Because I'm not in a good mood today, and I'm sick of users removing quotes and shit from articles when they are SUPPOSED to bloody be there. I get really sick of cleaning up the mess others leave behind. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:11, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Because he is legitimately trying to be helpful. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:23, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

What? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:28, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Card Rulings

yes it is Muzzy86 (talk • contribs) 22:55, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Colourless's Lore.

• Although its Full Effect is Unknown, Its Summoning Condition Has Been Confirmed by the Character, Which can be Mentioned in its Lore. --User:002517 (talk • contribs) 07:33, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

• You're Welcome. --User:002517 (talk • contribs) 11:46, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Unregisterd user.

That same unregister user said when he reverted a morons edit, that he was given permission. I had to respond on his talk page that it was me who was given permission, however I stated to him that if someone tries to take that out of Leo's bio that by all means he should revert to.Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 13:27, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Proof!

I'm sorry, but there is also no proof as to the "rule" Others keep adding. Sure they put a link in the references, however we can't even see the discussion from this link as to "why" or "why not" on this ruling. So there's no proof on what they're trying to say as well. So please, get someone so we can discuss this more since it seems to be 50/50 right now. Tea-Girl08 18:23, May 31, 2011 (EST)

Really? Sorry, I did not know of this. But still, even judges make mistakes when misinformed. So I'll just ask ATEMVEGETA as to "why" on the ruling. Also, what symbols? This is my first time using the "User Talk", so sorry if I messed up somewhere. Tea-Girl08 18:32, May 31, 2011 (EST)

Monster Effect

Actually, if the destruction effect is negated (Stardust, Divine Wrath, etc...), then there's no milling.

I guess I should have mentioned that I was talking about the second effect of Cyber Vally, my mistake for the lack of descriptive information. I was just giving examples since I heard some local judge said that these were "legit" moves, which they aren't do to Konami rulings.

Thank you though.

Tea-Girl08 21:58, June 01, 2011 (EST)

Wait, it says "draw 4"? Oops, that's supposed to be "draw 3", but I think the basic idea is known.

I just became a judge recently, I just need to wait for that email from Konami first.

Tea-Girl08 22:12, June 01, 2011 (EST)

4 does sound more logical then 3, if this rule was true (which I'm glad it isn't). I'm just repeating what the duelist said who got this ruling from a judge. I didn't believe this was true, but since it was a casual duel I just decided to let it slide. Tea-Girl08 22:18, June 01, 2011 (EST)

Back from the Graveyard.

Pleased to meet you. Glad to see the site being maintained well. Just adding an extra hand to help.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 23:45, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Missing Errata/Fixing Errata

Same for your "gallery topic" on my talk page, I'll add here when i find an errata that need to be fixed. Here's the first: Card Errata:Phoenix Wing Wind Blast Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 15:44, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Do you want to make a not for these two cards? It is exactly the same text but the writings is smaller in the the original lore than in the reedition. Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 17:59, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Elemental HERO Wild Wingman's Images

Delt got to it. I was at work when you messaged me, so I didn't get it until about seven or so hours later and he had already moved them. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 14:22, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Thank you for the idea

I actually saw a comment by you on deviantArt about 30 minutes ago.

(Also, I knew that message was from you about that page before I saw it. Don't know how XD) - Silver Glaceon @ 21:14, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

It was this account on one of slifertheskydragon's deviations — This unsigned comment was made by Silver Glaceon (talk • contribs) 21:30, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

D'oh! Thanks for fixing that. - Silver Glaceon @ 21:54, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

I clicked on a link to one of your fanfics about a month ago. - Silver Glaceon @ 08:31, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

I don't know which one it was, but I didn't have an account then so I couldn't comment/favorite. - Silver Glaceon @ 11:45, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Question

Lol, I don't get your point? Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 20:22, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

I got really confused for the Cestus haha because when you go on Dark Crisis the 1st edition gallery is called NA but the unlimited is called EN... I'll have to work on fixing that too soon! Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 09:56, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it was HEROS, not HERO'S according to the image policy. But yeah, it's done. Wilimut ^Talk_Mail Paris, 23:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)