Forum:What do you think of this Zane structure deck idea?

A Zane structure deck, definitely.

Cyber Dragon x3

Proto-Cyber Dragon

Cyber Phoenix

Cyber Kirin

cyber Dark Edge

Cyber Dark horn

Cyber Dark Keel

Cyber Barrier Dragon

Cyber Laser Dragon

Biofalcon

Heavy Mech Support Platform

Cyber Eltanin

Exploder Dragon

Troop Dragon x2

Red-Eyes Wyvern

Red Eyes Black Dragon

The Dragon Dwelling in the Cave

Masked Dragon

Twin-headed Behemoth

Axe Dragonute

Cyber Twin Dragon

Cyber End Dragon

Chimeratech Fortress Dragon

Chimeratech Overdragon

Cyber Dark Dragon

power Bond

Overload Fusion

Polymerization

Different Dimension Capsule

Mystical Space Typhoon

Limiter Removal

Inferno Reckless Summon

Evolution Burst

Future Fusion

Cyberdark Impact!

Photon Generator Unit

Call of the Haunted

Defense Draw

Attack Reflector Unit

What do you think? Thedarkdoor (talk • contribs) 14:37, April 3, 2011 (UTC)thedarkdoor

Don't these things come with like, 3 new cards or something?--Helix-king (talk • contribs) 14:47, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Cyberdarks dont really work without Rebirth Judgment...Stormvale12 (talk • contribs) 16:41, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Taking the 5-card Extra Deck into account, that's 42 cards, meaning your main Deck has only 37 cards. Unless the 3 empty slots are reserved for the new cards or something, the Deck's too small. --Gadjiltron (talk • contribs) 07:32, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

I think an original Zane would be cooler than a "Dark" Zane. Cyberdarks are almost as bad as it gets (although Dragunities make them a bit better than sub-par).BobaFett2 (talk)

I guess it's a little difficult since the only monsters zane ever used were Cyber Dragon and its fusions x)

There are plenty of members in the original Cyber Style family for a regular Zane structure Deck to be built with minimal duplicates. Not to mention supporting monsters like Shining Angel can help fill in any unused card slots. --Gadjiltron (talk • contribs) 03:09, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Well Cyber Larva would be considered new in the US. So that's 1 "new card" if you want it like that. Adamtheamazing64 (talk • contribs) 22:59, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

• The new card is new everywhere. Not just the US. Try again.--Helix-king (talk • contribs) 10:40, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

But we'd need at least two to be of any real use, so that would take up too much space.BobaFett2 (talk)

Perhaps a Cyber Dragon Fusion (Hyper-Cyber Dragon: Cyber Dragon + Some Machine) or a Synchro (Supersonic Cyberdragon 1 Tuner + CyDra).BobaFett2 (talk)

i like this deck but there could be some improvements. like insted of kirin have a cyber valley. and three masked dragons insted of 2 troop dragons. and if your hearts set on red eyes cards then dump wyvern and replace it with 2 black chicks also if you want heavy mech you should probebly run 3 of them or 3 Ehero prismas for fusion summon or laser & barreir dragon support. a chaos sorcerer would be good as well. and eltain is good too but can be rendered useless with cards like effect veiler of torrentail tribute. plus if you've used overload fusion you wont be able to use him at all. spell cards your using look good but insted of inferno reckless summon you should add a dragons mirror or something. if you do you should add a five headed dragon to the fusion deck. and insted of evolution burst try dark hole or lightning vortex. if this structer deck was built for fusion summoning you should add a chain material and return from the diffrent dimension or diminsion fusion (dimension fusion is banned so you would only be able to use it in traditional format. fusion guard is good in cyberdark decks also. and i know it's not one of zane's but cyber shadow guardna can be a life saver. at least in my experance. as for the 3 new rares structer decks usaly have i think konami should create rebirth judgement, power wall, card from a diffrent dimension. these cards would rock a cyberdark/cyber dragon deck. any way thats only my opinion. it's up to you what you do with it. it's your deck after all.

Dude, isn't there some message that tells you not to post if a thread is so old -.- --Helix-king (talk • contribs) 23:27, June 13, 2012 (UTC)

sorry. didnt look. but whats the worst that could happen?

Nothing really, but necro-bumping is a little annoying--Helix-king (talk • contribs) 03:35, June 14, 2012 (UTC)