Difference between revisions of "Talk:Duelist Revolution"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(a Duelist Revolution it will be)
Line 46: Line 46:
  
 
== a Duelist Revolution it will be ==
 
== a Duelist Revolution it will be ==
I do know that there will be Accel Synchros and Tuner Synchros in up coming booster packs starting with this one. There will also be a change in game. The extra deck will go from 15 max to 20 max with only up to 5 of them being Tuners Synchro. The main deck will also go up from 60 cards max to 80. Accel Synchro Summonings will happen durring your opponets turn but you can only do 1 Accel Synchro Summon per turn--[[User:EMPSBladeKnight60|EMPSBladeKnight60]] 03:16, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
+
One theory that I know of is that there will be Accel Synchros and Tuner Synchros in up coming booster packs starting with this one. There will also be a change in game. The extra deck will go from 15 max to 20 max with only up to 5 of them being Tuners Synchro. The main deck will also go up from 60 cards max to 80. Accel Synchro Summonings will happen durring your opponets turn but you can only do 1 Accel Synchro Summon per turn--[[User:EMPSBladeKnight60|EMPSBladeKnight60]] 03:16, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
:*Care to share your proof?[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 03:18, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
:*Care to share your proof?[[User:Altyrell|Altyrell]] 03:18, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
:*the only thing i got is this ->[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pso9umTiYM] the web site its self is impossiable to get into if you are mathmatically challanged  but he is a trusted source and it is you tube so your got a video to go with it.--[[User:EMPSBladeKnight60|EMPSBladeKnight60]] 03:21, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
:*the only thing i got is this ->[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pso9umTiYM] the web site its self is impossiable to get into if you are mathmatically challanged  but he is a trusted source and it is you tube so your got a video to go with it.--[[User:EMPSBladeKnight60|EMPSBladeKnight60]] 03:21, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
This is about that same post as before.  This has not been proven true at all.  Without any visual proof, this source cannot be relied upon.--[[Special:Contributions/71.80.67.80|71.80.67.80]] 06:02, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
  
 
==Pack Image==
 
==Pack Image==

Revision as of 02:02, 15 March 2010

Have more people confirm it besides Shriek

There is a LOT wrong with this article right now; the "Japanese name" actually says Duelist Pack, NOT Duelist Revolution. Also, we have no idea of how many cards are even going to be in the set, let alone what rarities will and so on. The set is HUGELY unconfirmed right now, even if Shriek is a very reliable source.

The exact same thing happened with Absolute Powerforce. It was unconfirmed, and then later completely confirmed and nearly released into the TCG. I'm sure that this will be a real pack, as the first sets in each series have "Duelist" in them. But then again, I could be wrong. But to find out for sure, we're gonna' have to wait until around 21st January, release date of the next V-Jump Issue. If it's not confirmed in there, it won't be a real set. --AARONmeister 16:41, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

  • The thing is, is that at the moment, even Shriek has this as Unconfirmed.Altyrell 18:58, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

Shriek posts confirmed AND unconfirmed news. Most likely confirmed, but if it's an unconfirmed set then they post it as unconfirmed. --AARONmeister 19:00, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

I have an idea. Let`s just leave it open until it is confirmed. Otherwise we have to keep editing it. Until it is confirmed not to exist, keep it open. Simple. - Sebastiaan

So we should just not delete the page until we get the confirmed 1st set of 7th sereis. --AARONmeister 11:21, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Yes--Tapper930 16:57, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed

This set is confirmed! Click here! --AARONmeister 07:41, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Shriek is not a reliable source.--Tapper930 20:04, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed on Nakamura OCG (nakamuraocg.webs.com), owned by Nakamura Kyousuke, Rank II Official Konami OCGJudge.

RE:Shriek

Actually, Shriek is one of the most reliable sources (when the articles are confirmed, mind) when it comes to sets as he gets most of his information from V-Jump. User:Toob/Talk 11:01, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Miracle Contact

Is it possible that Miracle Contact could appear in this pack? It does give support to fusion monsters and also helps an existing theme. Neo-Spacian Adanac 20:52, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

  • Unlikely, but keep praying.--YamiWheeler 21:39, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, My user name does give it away-I like Neo-Spacians. --Neo-Spacian Adanac 15:30, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • That kinda sucks for you then, since they seem like a retired archetype now.--YamiWheeler 15:34, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Sad but true. The release of Twilight packs did improve my deck slightly, but not alot. But maybe because Jaden was in the 10th Anniversary Movie they might release it. If they did that would make my day. --Neo-Spacian Adanac 15:57, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

New info?

http://www.janime.eu/showthread.php/38949-Set-701-Duelist-Revolution/page2 Can we trust this site? (post #84 and #94) Falzar FZ 08:41, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

  • Since the source of Japanese text given is unconfirmed. We shouldn't put this in the main page --Blackwings0605 15:28, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Actually the info from there is true, i know this becuase the source they use for getting info for this booster is the same one they use to get all info for the episodes as well. DracoX 16:40, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

  • What about Valkyries and Toons? OMG! You did it 16:53, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
    • The info for new episodes comes from this thread in Nintendo BBS site, mostly posted by an user named XYZ龙加农 with confirmed scan image. The Accel Synchro, Valkyries and Toons they got from http://www.2chan.net/ site as far as I know is the very big site where people can upload image and discuss for everything. The info may be given by one of an anonymous user and there is visual source to confirm it. Read post#79 and post#85, it's fully unconfirmed info. --Blackwings0605 09:00, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

a Duelist Revolution it will be

One theory that I know of is that there will be Accel Synchros and Tuner Synchros in up coming booster packs starting with this one. There will also be a change in game. The extra deck will go from 15 max to 20 max with only up to 5 of them being Tuners Synchro. The main deck will also go up from 60 cards max to 80. Accel Synchro Summonings will happen durring your opponets turn but you can only do 1 Accel Synchro Summon per turn--EMPSBladeKnight60 03:16, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

  • Care to share your proof?Altyrell 03:18, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • the only thing i got is this ->[1] the web site its self is impossiable to get into if you are mathmatically challanged but he is a trusted source and it is you tube so your got a video to go with it.--EMPSBladeKnight60 03:21, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pack Image

Why is the dragon guy on the front blurred out? Doesn't anyone have his full picture? --Narutoheroes12 23:44, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

That scrambled image is a tease. A full, clear picture is not available yet.

That is mean to the power of painful.--Dragonking 02:27, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

I think the gray thing at the top is the knight's sword. Also, the dragon seems to be blue and white, so it's probably Ancient Fairy Dragon, but I don't think that monster has a pink tail.--Dragonking 23:57, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that Surging Dragon Knight has anything to do with Ancient Fairy Dragon.--71.80.67.80 05:25, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm the name and "tease" image seem very similar to the dragunity knight archetype and since theres a possibility of a dragunity structure deck then this might possibly be true

Still, so far every 5ds cover card, with the exception of Power Tool Dragon, has been one of or related to the Signer Dragons, so I'm quite positive that one of them is dragon in the fusion of Surging Dragon Knight Dragonquites. But I am open to any possibility at this point.--Dragonking 23:35, March 14, 2010 (UTC)