Difference between revisions of "Talk:Number 107: Galaxy-Eyes Tachyon Dragon"
YamiWheeler (talk | contribs) (→number 107??) |
YamiWheeler (talk | contribs) (→Source) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --[[Special:Contributions/69.181.60.66|69.181.60.66]] ([[User talk:69.181.60.66|talk]]) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)- | Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --[[Special:Contributions/69.181.60.66|69.181.60.66]] ([[User talk:69.181.60.66|talk]]) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)- | ||
− | :Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources | + | :Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources for widely reported cards bother to check '''any''' Yu-Gi-Oh! news sites before asking here?--[[User:YamiWheeler|YamiWheeler]] ([[User talk:YamiWheeler|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/YamiWheeler|contribs]]) 23:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:49, 17 October 2012
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Number 107: Galaxy-Eyes Tachyon Dragon. | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
number 107??
How is this number 107, it sais in the numbers article that astral sais there is only 99 numbers. Is this just a mistake or is this card seriously number 107?
[email protected] (talk • contribs) 20:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
- It's unknown atm, because the Story of Zexal 2 hasn't developed that well, just be patient and everything will clear our minds. --E.G.G. (My Contributions) 20:23, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
- They might just skip numbers, they said 99/100 Numbers total, but never said they were numbered 1-100 DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 20:39, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
- This number may be potentially Dark Xyz, as we seen in 5D's, Dark Synchro.
W hy cant anyone keep the back card cause were just having a picture that hasn't been confirmed to be 107 seriously openings are always misleading--Veriteo (talk • contribs) 08:47, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Source
Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)-
- Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources for widely reported cards bother to check any Yu-Gi-Oh! news sites before asking here?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC)