Difference between revisions of "Talk:Number 107: Galaxy-Eyes Tachyon Dragon"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(number 107??)
(Source)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --[[Special:Contributions/69.181.60.66|69.181.60.66]] ([[User talk:69.181.60.66|talk]]) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)-
 
Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --[[Special:Contributions/69.181.60.66|69.181.60.66]] ([[User talk:69.181.60.66|talk]]) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)-
  
:Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources of widely reported cards bother to check '''any''' Yu-Gi-Oh! news sites before asking here?--[[User:YamiWheeler|YamiWheeler]] ([[User talk:YamiWheeler|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/YamiWheeler|contribs]]) 23:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
+
:Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources for widely reported cards bother to check '''any''' Yu-Gi-Oh! news sites before asking here?--[[User:YamiWheeler|YamiWheeler]] ([[User talk:YamiWheeler|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/YamiWheeler|contribs]]) 23:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:49, 17 October 2012

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Number 107: Galaxy-Eyes Tachyon Dragon.

Please try to

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • Be welcoming

number 107??

How is this number 107, it sais in the numbers article that astral sais there is only 99 numbers. Is this just a mistake or is this card seriously number 107?

[email protected] (talkcontribs) 20:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

It's unknown atm, because the Story of Zexal 2 hasn't developed that well, just be patient and everything will clear our minds. --E.G.G. (My Contributions) 20:23, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
They might just skip numbers, they said 99/100 Numbers total, but never said they were numbered 1-100 DreadKaiser (talkcontribs) 20:39, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • This number may be potentially Dark Xyz, as we seen in 5D's, Dark Synchro.

W hy cant anyone keep the back card cause were just having a picture that hasn't been confirmed to be 107 seriously openings are always misleading--Veriteo (talkcontribs) 08:47, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Source

Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)-

Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources for widely reported cards bother to check any Yu-Gi-Oh! news sites before asking here?--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 23:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC)