|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Honest to god, what a useless card, seriously, 3 monsters need to be given up for it, and all it really does is do what any other monster can, with or without the bloody effect. >_>
| + | {{Talk header}} |
| − | * You didn't follow the [[Match]] link. -- [[User:Deltaneos|Deltaneos]] 22:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | * Yeah, in tournaments, Matches are best out of three.
| |
| − | == No-Surrender Ruling? ==
| |
| | | | |
| − | Someone told me it's been ruled illegal to surrender with Victory Dragon out. Is this true? --[[User:Hitaka|Hitaka]] 10:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
| + | '''This Talk Page is only for the discussion on how to improve the article. Please post <u>[[Forum:General Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion|topics on general discussion]]</u> or <u>[[Forum:Yu-Gi-Oh! Ruling Queries|questions on rulings]]</u> in the Forums.'''--<span style="background-color:LightCyan; border:4px ridge blue; -moz-border-radius:1em;"> [[User:Hide Head Turtle|<span style="color:black;">'''HHTurtle'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Hide Head Turtle|'''Talk''']]</sup> </span> 03:42, November 1, 2010 (UTC) |
| − | :Surrendering is actually not part of the rule in Yugioh. It is in video games, but not in the card. So, the opponent can decide not to accept your forfeit. --[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:Pizzaman|Pizza]][[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:Pizzaman|man]] 14:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | *UDE rules state that you may concede the duel at any time.--[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:TwoTailedFox|TwoTailedFox]] ([[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:TwoTailedFox|My Talk Page]]) 14:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Oh my, didn't know that. I guess there are little differences between OCG and TCG rules. --[[w:c:YuGiOh:User:Pizzaman|Pizza]][[w:c:YuGiOh:User talk:Pizzaman|man]] 15:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Wow can i just say that it is good this card is banned--[[User:Wonderboi|Wonderboi]] 08:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | if you attack their lifepoints and their lifepoints were to go to 0, you win it technically what the card says. not that if you hit their wideopen life points, you automatically drain their life to 0.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == question ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Soo, the games are 2/3 to see who wins. If you hit them with this and reduce their life to 0, you don't have to win 2/3 and you just win (like the whole thing)?
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Yup. --[[User:Bluedog187|Bluedog]] ([[User talk:Bluedog187|Talk]]) 20:13, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | why is this card banned? its almost exactly the same as the other "match winnng" cards ex. Meteo the Matchless, Emperer of Lightning, Ulevo. Why are they special enough to stay in the unlimited list?
| |
| − | | |
| − | * They aren't usable at all. Read the bottom left corner of the other cards. The reason this card was banned was because it allows a player to win an entire Match (2 out of 3 duels) in just one duel.--[[User:Bluedog187|Bluedog]] ([[User talk:Bluedog187|Talk]]) 23:15, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Why is this certain card banned? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | why is this certain card banned? Uleva, Meteo the Matchless, and Queen of Fate- Eternia all have basically the same effect, but Victory dragon is for some reason the only one of them thats banned!
| |
| − | : [[Ulevo]], [[Meteo the Matchless|Meteo]] and [[Queen of Fate - Eternia|Eternia]] each have a limitation text on the bottom-left corner of the card (where the Card Number should be) which reads '''This card cannot be used in a Duel'''. This makes their status [[Illegal]] which is kinda worse than [[Forbidden]] (Banned). In retrospect, I think they would have wanted to make [[Victory Dragon]] Illegal too, but since it was already released they just Banned it afterwards. -- [[User:Melik el-Al'ab|Al-Malik]] [[User talk:Melik el-Al'ab|ملك الألعاب]] 18:45, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ACTUALLY ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | if u read the card it doesn't say that it reduces a player's life to 0 it say if it attacks (and) reduces the life to 0 you win the match...so technicaly it shouldn't be banned because it's saying that when it attacks and takes the remaning life points a player has you win the duel...nevermind it should be banned because you basically win all the duels(2/3) or(3/3) in its case. [[Special:Contributions/71.176.49.148|71.176.49.148]] 20:40, March 14, 2010 (UTC) lil e
| |
| − | | |
| − | :It's very clear said a match victory. And this card is only one make it to legal list, therefore the reason why it is current ban. That effect just said ''if'' you attack your opponent with Victory Dragon while your opponent's Life Points is less than dragon's ATK power current, you earn the victory for full match. --[[User:FredCat100|FredCat100]] 20:43, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == I'm confused == | |
| − | | |
| − | So, if this card is banned, how come it isn't on the wiki's Illegal card list? --[[User:Novafan365|Malevolence from the stars, it's {{subst:User:Novafan365/signature}}!!]] ([[User talk:Novafan365|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Novafan365|contribs]]) 01:05, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Because it has password code, not "This card cannot be play in the Duel." unlike the rest of other Match-Victory Monster Cards. --<span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style';">[[User:FredCat100|<span style="color:black;"><font size="3">F</font><font size="2">red</font><font size="3">C</font><font size="2">at</font></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:FredCat100|Ta.P.]] • [[User:FredCat100/friends|F.P.]] • [[User:FredCat100/Ruling List|J.R.]] • [[User:FredCat100/Disambiguation/Memoir_(disambiguation)|W.S.]] • [[User:FredCat100/Theory_of_Evilness_of_Yusei_Fudo|Th.P.]] • [[Special:Contributions/FredCat100|S.C.]]</sup></span> 01:08, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |
