Page history
27 March 2019
4 March 2017
3 March 2017
6 September 2016
5 October 2015
no edit summary
+1
Edited to show priority is not an outdated term, as it is still used in the rulebook v9.1
-167
17 July 2014
6 May 2014
28 April 2014
11 January 2014
8 June 2013
Protected "Priority": Subject to repeated vandalism; if someone really wants to help, they can make an account. ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))
mReverted edits by 58.179.179.188 (talk) to last version by UltimateKuriboh
m+438
no edit summary
-438
19 May 2013
18 May 2013
11 April 2013
10 April 2013
Reverted edits by 66.31.252.173 (talk) to last version by 71.116.96.249
m+274
no edit summary
+80
no edit summary
-354
11 February 2013
16 January 2013
2 October 2012
Since this is no longer a thing, using past tense in the lead, which might deter another page blank.
+3
no edit summary
+4,413
no edit summary
+1
Replaced content with "Priority is gone. http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:NO_PRIORITY%3F!%3F!%3F!%3F%3F!%3F%3F!?action=history http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:NO_PRIORITY%3F!%3F!%3F!%3F%3F!..."
-4,414
2 September 2012
16 July 2012
25 June 2012
28 April 2012
27 April 2012
25 April 2012
It doesn't really say that in that source, it sorta does in this one though; If it's been renamed, then we should have a page for it; and a few Yu-Gi-Oh!:Manual of style fixes.
+121
There...
-51
There, maybe that'll ease some of the shitheads. FFS, I hate that anyone can edit these pages sometimes.
+189
... Getting annoyed. - Undo revision 1881767 by Kilik kinak34 (talk)
-20
no edit summary
+20
Protected "Priority": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 23:17, May 25, 2012 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 23:17, May 25, 2012 (UTC)))
mYou're an idiot, fuck off and learn to read. - Undo revision 1881689 by 62.255.193.107 (talk)
-184
no edit summary
-31
previous information was wrong. priority is still in effect. PLEASE READ THE SITATION. it's just you cannot use spell speed 3 effects with priority. ONLY FAST EFFECTS
+215
Undo revision 1881685 by 62.255.193.107 (talk)
-184
no edit summary
+184
No, get lost. - Undo revision 1881677 by 62.255.193.107 (talk)
-115
no edit summary
+115
No there isn't. There aren't even any examples of such on this page. - Undo revision 1881574 by Djjomon (talk)
-20