Talk:Bad Reaction to Simochi OTK

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Bad Reaction to Simochi OTK.

Please try to

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • Be welcoming

Missing Ideas[edit]

you forgot heaps, add in starlight road. This effect negates a card that destroys 2 or more of your own cards, since you got plenty of continious cards, you will get heavy storm, x saber hylean and other cards that destroys your traps (bonus to this, it special summons stardust dragon which negates a lot of things). dark bribe, negates a trap or spell card so this is essential to stop heavy storm, the cost is your opponent draws 1 card, which isnt that much of a deal since there wont be another heavy storm to take out your set cards.

Essenial clearing cards: 2-3 Caius the shadow monach 1 - lava golem (good for taking out monster cards with effects stopping your play)


Always had in these cards in any deck: Mirror force, heavy storm and torrential tribute.

Continious negate cards needed: 1 royal oppresion 1 level limit- b (its a spell card, good against royal decree which is common) 1 grave of the super ancient orgasm

No need for stall cards when you can have these cards instead which deals a lot: 3 - naturia beans ( with scrap-iron so you still deal damage when you negate a attack)

2 - kuriboh (when attacked you can send it to your hand to deal dmg to your opponent to the number of that attacking cards atk only while bad simochi is in play)

3 - evil thorns ( I Like these cards, I use this to help syncro summoning) I add in debris dragons to special summon from the grave. its really handy in this deck. and if you are with me on the syncroing with this deck, add in scrape goat to special summon more monster for the syncro also good for stalling.

You most likely do not understand how a Main page or Talk page works. The page you are commenting about is a Main Page. On those pages, Ideas are left in order for viewers to understand the deck, its capabilities, and its weaknesses. This includes combos, OTKs, and recommended cards. Unless there is a specific card that is useful and integrated in the deck, there is no reason to list Staple cards. Saying that Starlight Road is needed is not only not true for the use in the combos but is also redundant in the case that a person with this deck should use a little common sense and look for disruptive counter-attempts. This deck can be completely made without using Bad Reaction to Simochi due to the Nurse monster having the same effect. in that case, it would be illogical for me to worry about Heavy Storm.
For these Talk pages, these are only for ways to improve the article. You have done that already, however if you think that your ideas should have been added to the page, you should have added them yourself. You also always need to sign your posts on Talk Pages. This can be achieved by using four of the symbol to the left of the Number 1 Key. Hold down your shift key and hit the key mentioned 4 times. it should be some sort of swivel: ~. Posting all that you did above is not helping the article because most users do not read this page. --LordGeovanni- (Talk To Me) *Kupo* 04:29, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Idea: Merge into "Anti-Cure"? Add notice to that page?[edit]

Okay, there is a new page that has been made for Anti-Cure. This page has little reason to still be around. I have two possible solutions:

  • 1 - Keep this page and have the Anti-Cure page directly link to this one. This would allow this page to still be on the Deck Type page. (OTK Deck)
  • 2 - Remove this page and add its info to the Anti-Cure page. Make that one the new OTK page.

I am asking for opinions to this. I am hoping to have a decision made within a week. --LordGeovanni- (Talk To Me) *Kupo* 18:53, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Yea, it's essentially the same thing. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:36, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

One suggestion: I happened to come across Number 63: Shamojii Soldier recently, and one of it's effects allows for a 1000 life point increase to both players. However, it is only once per turn, and besides that a small amount, but I wonder if that would constitute good support.Bashfrog (talkcontribs) 01:42, August 13, 2014 (UTC)Bashfrog

I would agree that "Number 63: Shamoji Soldier" would be useful in this deck. The issue is its requirements for summoning. Most of the Level one monsters that could be easily summoned multiple times (like "Treeborn Frog") require something that this Deck cannot easily focus on. For example, "Treeborn" would require no traps or spells and this Deck would prefer to keep "Bad Reaction" around due to the difficulty in searching it as well as being one of the focus cards in this Deck. If you can think of a consistent idea that allows multiple Level 1 monsters on the field, I would say to add it to the page. I have looked into Number 63, myself. Sadly, I couldn't think of a good way to use it. --LordGeovanni- (Talk To Me) *Kupo* 14:24, August 13, 2014 (UTC)