Difference between revisions of "Talk:Desert Protector"

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Gardna Member)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Yeah, I wish that to. [[User:Shardsilver|Shardsilver]] ([[User talk:Shardsilver|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shardsilver|contribs]]) 17:53, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 
Yeah, I wish that to. [[User:Shardsilver|Shardsilver]] ([[User talk:Shardsilver|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shardsilver|contribs]]) 17:53, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
:This was added before we agreed on archetype categorization. I wouldn't be surprised if it was added to the "Gardna" archetype by me. That said, Gardna has no support. However, all "Gardna" cards have one thing in common - they all have defensive effect of some sort. So I think this should stay in the "Gardna" series. That's what connects one "Gardna" to another - defense. [[User:Cheesedude|Cheesedude]] ([[User talk:Cheesedude|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cheesedude|contribs]]) 18:24, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:24, 30 December 2011

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Desert Protector.

Please try to

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • Be welcoming

Gardna Member

I am curious why is this card being part of "Gardna" article ever if it's NOT named as of "Gardna" or anything that included "Gardna" in his lore - he only gained 300 DEF points for Spell/Trap Card on the field... This card only supporting Insect instead, not Gardna. If you agreed with this, then it should get rid of "Archetype - Gardna". --FredCat 16:28, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

It's translated name does have "Gardna" in It's name actually, but I don't really see how It's related to the "Gardna" monsters other then by name. Shardsilver (talkcontribs) 17:27, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
Just saw that, didn't know about that. And I sometimes wish that the article itself could be clearly enough for understandable. Of course, I notice the line, but that don't have enough context to explain their existence. --FredCat 17:48, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I wish that to. Shardsilver (talkcontribs) 17:53, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

This was added before we agreed on archetype categorization. I wouldn't be surprised if it was added to the "Gardna" archetype by me. That said, Gardna has no support. However, all "Gardna" cards have one thing in common - they all have defensive effect of some sort. So I think this should stay in the "Gardna" series. That's what connects one "Gardna" to another - defense. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 18:24, December 30, 2011 (UTC)