Difference between revisions of "Forum:Need help building jurrac deck"
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
:You'd be surprised. Although he needs [[Jurrac Stauriko|Stauriko]] to use it properly, Titano is pretty hard to kill, particularly in builds that abuse [[Forbidden Lance]]. Plants have Trish and BRD, Twilight has Honest and JD, Agents have Trish and Honest, Dark World has nothing, Monarchs have Dark Dust Spirit and Soul Exchange, and Heroes have Abs0/Great Tornado. Evolzar Dolkka locks out many of these. [[Special:Contributions/207.233.120.2|207.233.120.2]] ([[User talk:207.233.120.2|talk]]) 18:19, October 17, 2011 (UTC) | :You'd be surprised. Although he needs [[Jurrac Stauriko|Stauriko]] to use it properly, Titano is pretty hard to kill, particularly in builds that abuse [[Forbidden Lance]]. Plants have Trish and BRD, Twilight has Honest and JD, Agents have Trish and Honest, Dark World has nothing, Monarchs have Dark Dust Spirit and Soul Exchange, and Heroes have Abs0/Great Tornado. Evolzar Dolkka locks out many of these. [[Special:Contributions/207.233.120.2|207.233.120.2]] ([[User talk:207.233.120.2|talk]]) 18:19, October 17, 2011 (UTC) | ||
− | + | I am the owner of this deck idea .Double summon is good for getting out synchros or XYZs, jurrac herra is a defense mechanism. I see that you think this is a defensive build even tough it is an offensive archetype. I could run cards that are more offensive but still can counter meta decks.However, some cards must stay for this idea to come into motion. What do you think about running an offensive/ semi-antimeta Jurrac deck ideas? | |
+ | |||
+ | Use : and :: to space your response, not actual spaces. [[Double Summon]] isn't necessary, since Guaiba can get Material for you at no cost. You should be playing everything in face-up ATK, and attacking with it. Jurracs have [[Fossil Dig|fast]] [[Evolzar|tribals]], high consistency, high drawpower, big Extra Deck plays, and good ATK. These are (most of) the attributes of a Meta Deck. Making them anti-Meta would be doable, but self-defeating since they too are reliant on battle, Special Summons, and the Graveyard. [[Special:Contributions/207.233.120.2|207.233.120.2]] ([[User talk:207.233.120.2|talk]]) 02:27, October 20, 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:27, 20 October 2011
Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Deck Help → Need help building jurrac deck Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
This forum thread has been unedited for 4622 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
I need some constructive help on building a jurrac deck. Here is what I have so far in ideas.
Monsters:
Jurrac Velo X2
Jurrac Herra X2
Jurrac Aeolo X2
Black Ptera X2
Jurrac Dino X2
Extra deck
Scrap Dragon X2
Spells:
Fossil Dig X3
Book of Moon X1
Shrink X2
One for One X2
Traps:
So give me some changes and deck ideas.
Forgot to add foolish burial
- BobaFett says use Template:Decklist. "Foolish Burial" is Limited.
- Don't use "Jurrac Herra", "Black Ptera", or "Jurrac Protops". This Deck is designed to be aggressive with Spell/Trap support to gain advantage through effects. I wouldn't suggest Monoloph either, even if you can permanently boost its ATK. Try some support monsters like Gorz or "Super-Ancient Dinobeast" instead.
- Use more Staple Synchros if you can, and use "Evolzar Dolkka". It's good.
- Avoid "Double Summon". It doesn't help. Don't use "Hunting Instinct" because it's situational and you don't have anything worth Summoning. Don't use either Reclamation. They only work once and cost you two cards for one. I'd suggest some Staples like "Mirror Force" and "Bottomless Trap Hole".
Designless Square (talk • contribs) 00:41, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Foolish Burial is Limited. Anyhow, everything he says. BF2 Talk Deck Guides 13:56, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
Here's the deck I currently use it works, it's quite wuick and agressive but the main problem is the Guaiba-dependance. Also, I never loose when I manage to summon Laggia in the first or second turn. Good luck :)
- 3x Gilasaurus
- 3x Jurrac Guaiba
- 3x Jurrac Velo
- 2x Jurrac Protops
- 2x Hyper Hammerhead
- 2x Jurrac Dino
- 1x Jurrac Gallim
- 1x Jurrac Aeolo
- 1x Jurrac Titano
- 3x Fossil Dig
- 2x Molten Destruction
- 1x One for One (good combo with aeolo)
Staples... you choose
Extra Deck:
- 1x Catastor
- 1x Brionac
- 2x Jurrac Giganoto
- 1x Jurrac Meteor
- 1x Jurrac Velphito
- 1x Mist Wurm
- 1x Scrap Dragon
- 1x Stardust Dragon
- 1x Trishula, Dragon of the Ice Barrier
- 2x Evolzar Dolka
- 2x Evolzar Laggia
- 1x Grenosaurus
Wakeuptome 80.119.71.3 (talk) 15:26, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
Jurrac Titano isn't very good. BF2 Talk Deck Guides 16:39, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- You'd be surprised. Although he needs Stauriko to use it properly, Titano is pretty hard to kill, particularly in builds that abuse Forbidden Lance. Plants have Trish and BRD, Twilight has Honest and JD, Agents have Trish and Honest, Dark World has nothing, Monarchs have Dark Dust Spirit and Soul Exchange, and Heroes have Abs0/Great Tornado. Evolzar Dolkka locks out many of these. 207.233.120.2 (talk) 18:19, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
I am the owner of this deck idea .Double summon is good for getting out synchros or XYZs, jurrac herra is a defense mechanism. I see that you think this is a defensive build even tough it is an offensive archetype. I could run cards that are more offensive but still can counter meta decks.However, some cards must stay for this idea to come into motion. What do you think about running an offensive/ semi-antimeta Jurrac deck ideas?
Use : and :: to space your response, not actual spaces. Double Summon isn't necessary, since Guaiba can get Material for you at no cost. You should be playing everything in face-up ATK, and attacking with it. Jurracs have fast tribals, high consistency, high drawpower, big Extra Deck plays, and good ATK. These are (most of) the attributes of a Meta Deck. Making them anti-Meta would be doable, but self-defeating since they too are reliant on battle, Special Summons, and the Graveyard. 207.233.120.2 (talk) 02:27, October 20, 2011 (UTC)