Forum:Deus Ex Machina
| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Deck Help → Deus Ex Machina Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5202 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
Hey, all, this is Gadjiltron here. So, recently I got 3 copies of Machiner's Command, and I figured I'd try putting a Machiners Deck with the resources I possess...
Deus Ex Machina
|
|---|
|
As usual, lots of room for improvement. I had to compromise on some removal for backup stall or something. Any suggestions? --Gadjiltron 09:17, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Okay, playtesting has called for several changes:
--Gadjiltron 14:21, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
I haven't dabbled in Machina yet, so I'll just wait for Runer to get here.--Akiza Izayoi 22:49, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
HEEEEEERE'S RUNER! (Never seen that movie, BTW). Get two copies of Scrap Recycler. It works wonders with Gadgets, maintaining hand advantage like nothing you've ever seen. And get a third Frontline. Runer5h 20:38, February 13, 2010 (UTC)Runer5h
Though, through experience I hardly get to use Frontline's effects often, either due to monsters getting killed off through effects or my S/Ts saving the battle completely. If I would put that in, what should go out in its place? --Gadjiltron 14:49, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I don't know... if the third Frontline hasn't been useful for you, feel free not to insert it. But you should definitely use those Scrap Recyclers. Runer5h 16:02, February 14, 2010 (UTC)Runer5h
Hey, the Recyclers worked. Thanks a bunch.
- -1 Machiners Sniper
- -1 Magical Cylinder
- -1 Dimensional Prison
- +2 Scrap Recycler
- +1 Divine Wrath
I found out that Stardust is a serious threat to the Deck, even with things that are not destruction. --Gadjiltron 10:31, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
Might I recomend a 3rd Machina Fortress? as it has easy summon conditions, and can suicide Stardust Dragon and then destroy a card afterwards?~-193.62.251.50 12:08, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
