Talk:Desert Protector

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Desert Protector.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Gardna Member

I am curious why is this card being part of "Gardna" article ever if it's NOT named as of "Gardna" or anything that included "Gardna" in his lore - he only gained 300 DEF points for Spell/Trap Card on the field... This card only supporting Insect instead, not Gardna. If you agreed with this, then it should get rid of "Archetype - Gardna". --FredCat 16:28, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

It's translated name does have "Gardna" in It's name actually, but I don't really see how It's related to the "Gardna" monsters other then by name. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 17:27, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Just saw that, didn't know about that. And I sometimes wish that the article itself could be clearly enough for understandable. Of course, I notice the line, but that don't have enough context to explain their existence. --FredCat 17:48, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I wish that to. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 17:53, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

This was added before we agreed on archetype categorization. I wouldn't be surprised if it was added to the "Gardna" archetype by me. That said, Gardna has no support. However, all "Gardna" cards have one thing in common - they all have defensive effect of some sort. So I think this should stay in the "Gardna" series. That's what connects one "Gardna" to another - defense. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:24, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Defense OR Protecting, but yes; you're correct, Cheesy. --FredCat 10:38, December 31, 2011 (UTC)