Difference between revisions of "Talk:Number 107: Galaxy-Eyes Tachyon Dragon"
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Don't tell me; this is the "Galaxy Eyes" equivalent of "Blue Eyes Shining Dragon". And if that's the case, this monster will be a Rank 8 Light Dragon-type monster with 3000 Atk and 2500 Def. | Don't tell me; this is the "Galaxy Eyes" equivalent of "Blue Eyes Shining Dragon". And if that's the case, this monster will be a Rank 8 Light Dragon-type monster with 3000 Atk and 2500 Def. | ||
--[[Special:Contributions/68.229.80.101|68.229.80.101]] ([[User talk:68.229.80.101|talk]]) 21:36, October 20, 2012 (UTC) 68.229.80.101 | --[[Special:Contributions/68.229.80.101|68.229.80.101]] ([[User talk:68.229.80.101|talk]]) 21:36, October 20, 2012 (UTC) 68.229.80.101 | ||
+ | |||
+ | I do believe tha it will be a rank 8 but dark monster as it has a purple outline something we mostly see in dark monsters(not all the time though) |
Revision as of 15:22, 31 October 2012
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Number 107: Galaxy-Eyes Tachyon Dragon. | |
---|---|
|
Please try to
|
number 107??
How is this number 107, it sais in the numbers article that astral sais there is only 99 numbers. Is this just a mistake or is this card seriously number 107?
[email protected] (talk • contribs) 20:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
- It's unknown atm, because the Story of Zexal 2 hasn't developed that well, just be patient and everything will clear our minds. --E.G.G. (My Contributions) 20:23, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
- They might just skip numbers, they said 99/100 Numbers total, but never said they were numbered 1-100 DreadKaiser (talk • contribs) 20:39, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
- This number may be potentially Dark Xyz, as we seen in 5D's, Dark Synchro.
W hy cant anyone keep the back card cause were just having a picture that hasn't been confirmed to be 107 seriously openings are always misleading--Veriteo (talk • contribs) 08:47, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Source
Where did this card's name came from ? source ? Please don't turn out to be a another fake. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:34, October 17, 2012 (UTC)-
- Do any of you people who constantly ask for sources for widely reported cards bother to check any Yu-Gi-Oh! news sites before asking here?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:46, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
like 50% of the time, turns out to be fake - but this time there was some truth to this info - can't wait to see a sneak preview of this card later on in the future. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 00:03, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- You're looking in the wrong places if it turns out to be fake "50% of the time."--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 00:04, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
not my fault people want to be jerks and uploads fake shit on this site; like flashing carat dragon - stardust but hey i should check shriek.org more often. (Not trying to sound like a jerk - my bad if i sound like that) --69.181.60.66 (talk) 00:16, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Is part of the name "Spacia-Time" even right? I sometimes find "Tachyon" in its place instead. 70.79.84.206 (talk) 01:39, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Pojo Thread usually lie. Just look at Shriek and it sister site (Chazz's japan name site in same fashion as Shriek's) are usually true and never lied. I trusted those two, but never Pojo. Also we have to following the translation name, it's Spacia-Time. If the TCG post is release, we can change it to that name only if it's official printed on the card. --iFredCat 01:44, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I think considering the booster name is "Lord of the Tachyon Galaxy", then this should also be called Tachyon instead of Spacia-Time. Shamus (talk • contribs) 10:53, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
Information came from here [1]. DracoX (talk • contribs) 03:22, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, usually, cards with only kanji usually have hiragana above it for pronouncation, but so far, i don't see anything from any source. Well, i guess i'll have to wait a little longer. 70.79.84.206 (talk) 06:57, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Don't tell me; this is the "Galaxy Eyes" equivalent of "Blue Eyes Shining Dragon". And if that's the case, this monster will be a Rank 8 Light Dragon-type monster with 3000 Atk and 2500 Def. --68.229.80.101 (talk) 21:36, October 20, 2012 (UTC) 68.229.80.101
I do believe tha it will be a rank 8 but dark monster as it has a purple outline something we mostly see in dark monsters(not all the time though)