File talk:Rio.png

This is the talk page for discussing the page, File:Rio.png.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Pick a pic

The constant revisions of this image are becoming annoying. While higher art quality, the scratches detract from the overall quality. That said, the other one isn't particularly spectacular, either. My solution: get an image of the first picture uploaded (without the text in the top right), crop out the empty space in the left, and use that. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 12:55, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Revisions is being charitable, this could easily be classified as a straight-up edit war. I don't see anything wrong with either image, I'm especially not seeing the argument that the quality is worse on the current one. They both look just fine to me. There may as be an image from episode 81 that could be used instead. Regardless, this needs to stop. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:16, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I agreed with Roy - it's better off to have a character with no damages mark all over their face and bod. Roy got one without injuries so far while Zexal user just put in closer version (which has an injury on). I personality non-injured version over the injured one. --iFredCat 15:50, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Of the two images in the war, the unscratched is what I prefer as well. However, I don't like how thick her hair fangs (or whatever you want to call them) look in the current one, which is why I suggested taking a third option. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 16:02, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

So called "Hair Fangs" are known as "Hair Bangs". What was the other image you wished to show? --iFredCat 16:57, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

33Royward is always doing this. I've had several arguments with him over which image is better. I personally think the one with scratches is better as its drawn better, even with the scratches. Plus, it's centralised (which 33 has used against me in the past when I was arguing with him over the IV image). TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 18:18, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry but I am with Roy this time - non-injured version is better over injured version. --iFredCat 18:20, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

His picture is drawn by Kazunori Takahashi who is the worst Animation Director in Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL, both in art and animation. However my picture is drawn by Noh Gil-Bo and/or Kim Hye-Jeong who are one of the best and most talented Animation Directors in Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL. That's why Kazunori Takahashi animates non-important episodes or fillers such as Episode 81 to save the professional animators time to animate more important episodes. You can clearly see that my picture is better looking in everything except for the injury. Every character that Kazunori Takahashi draws looks so "DERP", his style of drawing is very bad, he just can't draw well. If you were paying attention to the Animation Quality while watching an episode, you would understand what i'm talking about. ZexalRandom (talk • contribs) 18:36, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Golden Key: Like this? (But you'd still need to crop out the "empty space in the left".) Dunkles Magiermädchen (talk • contribs) 19:20, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

@ZexalRandom, it don't matter - no injury version is better! --iFredCat 19:21, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

That's exactly what I meant, Dunkles. Same art style that ZexalRandom likes, but with no scratches. I think it looks best, what about everyone else? --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 19:27, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I think that image Dunkles showed is perfect and indeed works best. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 19:32, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I am following with ya, Goldy and Shard. --iFredCat 19:36, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

So we're all good with this then? --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 22:52, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Just little more cut on the left, either way, it look great. --iFredCat 22:56, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Since the picture is also used on Portal:Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL anime characters, I think it should have a 16:9 width:height ratio. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:59, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Cathy, Sei and one guy invalided your respond - they are little bigger than just "width". --iFredCat 23:27, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Or does my response invalidate Cathy, Sei and one guy? The different sized images make that portal look messy. Compare it to Portal:Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's Tag Force 4 characters, where every image is the same size. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:44, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Their avatar size are little "tall" than their original size. But 5D's Tag Force characters does suit the situation. On the other hand, we should get those three with other two into correct image size if we are strict following the requirement. --iFredCat 23:48, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Okay Delta, could you move the image over a bit to the left and re-size it appropriately? --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 23:49, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

File:Rio portal.jpg? -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:14, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, so we delete Rio.png now? --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 02:12, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

ZexalRandom is fine with the portal image, so deleting this now. And so concludes the war. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 18:57, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Er, get your bowl-home [sic] clean, it's already gone by time you responded. (bowl-home is one of Goldfish home, just other humor reference...) --iFredCat 19:28, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

I am not against the picture suggested by Goldy. I am only against the injuries which makes it bad. The bad thing about the picture is it is not centralized. ----SharkTenjo 23:50, December 3, 2012 (UTC)