Forum:Alien dog help
| Forums: | Index → Help desk → Alien dog help Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signatures and Help:Talk pages for further information. |
 | This forum thread has been unedited for 5231 days and is considered archived. Please don't add to the discussion, unless absolutely necessary. |
If my opponent normal summon an alien, I use bottomless or torrent or compulsory or book of moon, can he spesum alien dog??
If my opponent normal summon alien ammonite n active its effect, can he spesum alien dog again???Daredevil^^ 11:25, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Alien Dog is a Trigger Effect,so when you summon the alien, Dog triggers then the opponent can bottomless your first alien. Dog should still resolve after that.
- you can use Both Ammonite and Dog's effect since they both activate in response to the same thing (Ammonite's successful Normal Summon). You may activate both effects in a chain if you want to, and because they are both optional and you control both, you may choose the order that they go on the chain. Falzar FZ 11:33, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
so when alien normal summon, we cannot negate the spesum by destroy the first alien???Daredevil^^ 11:43, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Exactly.ALPHACKER 15:55, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I think you can negate the Summon of the First Alien, that way, Dog never even gets to Trigger.
- Alien Dog only Triggers if the Summon was Successful. Falzar FZ 21:18, February 22, 2010 (UTC)
so how???I'm already confusedDaredevil^^ 01:09, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Um, what do you mean by "we cannot negate the spesum by destroy the first alien"?
- If the Normal Summoned "Alien" is just removed from the field (by "Bottomless Trap Hole"), then the effect of "Alien Dog" will still resolve properly. The effect of "Alien Dog" was successfully activated, and there's no reason for it to require the other "Alien" to remain on the field.
- If the Normal Summon of the "Alien" is negated (by "Horn of Heaven"), then you can't even activate the effect of "Alien Dog" in the first place. I think this is what Falzar meant.
- --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 04:24, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I was referring to.
- Oh, so I did misread the second question a bit. (I half read the question and then someone wanted to duel me xD) Falzar FZ 05:17, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
