Forum:Deck rate?

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This is my machina deck. I would like to know your opinions on it. If you have any suggestions, please lmk. Thanks

Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 14:59, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Why do you have Battle Fader amd Tragoedia? They mess with your Solidarity. Try Swift-Attacking Scarecrow. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 16:21, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Seems fine 'cept the Solidarity problem mentioned by DGO, though you might want to try and fit in a 2nd Mystical Space Typhoon, a Monster Reborn & a Dark Hole what with the new banlist and all-82.11.158.0 (talk) 16:23, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

well, i did thought about it but if you see, when battle fader effect activates it gets removed from play when removed from the field. it only leaves tragoedia and you won't draw him that often. i just tested the deck and did great. sometimes i really like to get my monsters destroyed because of armored unit. tragoedia is just in case something goes wrong. as for the new banlist i really don't have a clue of what to take out for a monster reborn and the other MST. i don't like torrential so i think i'll pass on darkhole too but already sided 2 starlight roads for it. Thanks and please keep the suggestions coming. Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 16:51, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

-1 Magical Hats. +1 MST. -1 Solidarity/Smashing Ground (unless you want to take out Geartown or something]]. + 1 Monster Reborn. -1 Tragoedia. + 1 Gorz. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 16:42, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

I thought about -1 trap stun for monster reborn but magical hats are for the geartown combo. if it's at 1 it becomes harder to get and right now it's really hard because almost everyone i've played uses decree, so really thinking this one. Gorz would be good if i could use it but i always have something set, it could be geartown(waiting to be destroyed), armored unit or some trap/bluff. it would be on very rare occasions i could have use for it. Thanks for the advice. Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 16:50, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Does this look better? I belive it does but would like to know your thoughts.Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 22:16, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

My one suggestion would be doing 2 MSTs and 1 Less Giant Trunade, since it only stalls for a turn. Just my thoughts. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 02:08, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

yes but in that turn the game can change a lot. like getting you a gearframe, fortress and gadjiltron at the same time with solidarity. I like the 2 mst but wanted to get your opinions on double cyclone. lmk thanks Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 02:56, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Double Cyclone is defintely good for this Deck. Though, at times, you may wish you jsut had another MST instead of that, for the scenario that you don't have any oher s/ts. But that's unlikely, and it's very good. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 02:55, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

yeah, it could be +2 easily. so leave it like it is. do you think it's tournament worthy? could you give it a rating? i want to be really sure that no more tweeking is needed. thanks Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 03:02, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

I think it would do fairly well in a tournament. You need a good side-deck, of course. Try this:

SIDE DECK


It's a basic- yet good- Side Deck for Machina Gadgets/Gears. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 03:40, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

What do you think about this side deck I had came up with?

Side deck

Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 04:27, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Forgot about Intercept Wave. Best anti-synchro in the Shining Darkness. It looks good. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 04:58, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Oh yeah. make sure you have 3 Chimeratech Fortress Dragons in your extra deck, in case your opponent is using Cyber Dragon beatdown with Machines. --Drew-Gi-Oh! (talk) 04:59, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

I've been teating the deck with the new banlist and I think I'll add another double cyclone because there's a lot of setting going on now. Any suggestions on what to take out or should I just put it in. Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 20:11, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

I tested the deck on a tournament during the weekend and it really s*****. I went 0-4 with it. The problem was not enough defense so when my monsters were destroyed I couldn't do anything to stop theirs. So I decided to run it like this now and hopefully it becomes more competitive. Please lmk your thoughts.

side deck

Evil4g63 (talkcontribs) 18:10, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

this deck is really really really fail i prefer my epic pwn deck it focuses on summoning bob warrior thats easy cuz ur allowed to have 40 in ur deck and it can direct attack during 1st turn and it has 8000 atk destroyed during end phase