Talk:Volcanic Deck

Volcanic RFP Burn

Should a Voolcanic Remove from Play Burn Deck be mentioned? Pretty much it is using Volcanic Counter, Soul of Fire, and other RFP burn cards and if needed end with a D.D. Dynamite. I'm just wondering if it has enough to acctually be noted. Dmaster (Talk • Contribs • Count) 18:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

other good cards for a volcanic deck:

raging flame srpite gia soul the combustible collective and gravity bind.

Deletion?

Why would this article (of all deck types) be marked for deletion when it is probably one of the most well written? Fire decks are extremely uncommon and the fact that the Volcanic Monsters exhibit some fire prominence should really hold this article up on a higher level. —This unsigned comment was made by PatrykowskiFury (talk • contribs) 14:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The Delete reason said to see Talk:Assault Mode Deck. Did you look there? Plus thisn't a well written article. It's a set of guidlines, not an encyclopedic article. Anything that keeps refering to the reader, saying "you" is not encyclopedic content. It gives an example Decklist. Articles are supposed to document information, not provided a selected Decklist. That's just someone trying to broadcast their own work. Anything the writer comes up themself is not particuarily notable. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

you need to keep everything on that article esspecially the volcanic combos

• I believe that Volcanic decks belong under the Volcanic archetype article. Messengerofthedark 02:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)