User talk:Deltaneos/Archive 36

From Yugipedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Templates

I don't know if this is the right place to put this, but maybe you can help me. I was trying to make this "http://mfbeyblade.wikia.com/wiki/Metal_Fight_Beyblade_-_Episode_001" look like this ""http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Yu-Gi-Oh!_5D%27s_-_Episode_001" Whoever did those templates on the Yugioh wikia here, could you please help me fix that on mine so it'll display correctly?

Also, how is it that the Yugioh wikia has a "Special:Browse" but my mfbeyblade wikia don't? Shouldn't that be on all wikia's? the Special:Browse thing? DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 12:41, November 30, 2010 (UTC).

Thank you. Now I understand, hehehe. DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 13:07, November 30, 2010 (UTC).

That SMW thing is installed, but... can you please fix this:?

it still messed up some. DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 18:21, November 30, 2010 (UTC).

Oh, I forgot something: http://mfbeyblade.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Metal_Fight_Beyblade_episodes/season_1

no matter what I do, it still says {{{header}}} {{{body}}} on it. DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 21:38, November 30, 2010 (UTC).

Any reason why "http://mfbeyblade.wikia.com/wiki/Metal_Fight_Beyblade_Original_Arc" is still like this?

When it should be like this "http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Fortune_Cup" DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 00:57, December 1, 2010 (UTC).

I don't see how episode 2 and its picture is showing up on original Arc 2. DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 01:06, December 1, 2010 (UTC).

I added in the has type thing on "http://mfbeyblade.wikia.com/wiki/Property%3AEpisode_number" and "http://mfbeyblade.wikia.com/wiki/Type:Number" I created. Now look at the "http://mfbeyblade.wikia.com/wiki/Metal_Fight_Beyblade_Original_Arc" no pictures. DranzerX13 (talk • contribs) 01:22, December 1, 2010 (UTC).

Re: Featured Cards

I've commented. And I see the problem - some of these new featured card pages really do suck. Runer5h (talk • contribs) 02:51, December 1, 2010 (UTC)Runer5h

Template:Ruby and SMW

Any idea why this is breaking SMW so horribly, and how we might fix it? {{Ruby}} would be a vast improvement over <ruby>...</ruby>, from a code readability standpoint, so SMW not liking it is a problem. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 04:21, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

In the factbox at the bottom of the page, the value for "Ruby Text" is has the middle replaced with "..." because it's so long. This results in a closing </span> without a corresponding opening <span> messing the page up. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:53, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
Regarding fixing, maybe we should report it as a bug. The new skin doesn't have the factbox and doesn't break when HTML tags are missing like that, so it's not a problem there. Newer versions of SMW allow you to remove the factbox, which is probably a good idea. It's not something readers need to see. Plus the link to Special:Browse in the sidebar (something the new skin lacks) can be used instead. Although, I don't know if that breaks too with missing HTML tags. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:07, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
I've been trying to come up with some way we could accept a plain-text value for the ruby text and format it for display, while passing the plain-text value to SMW, but without some really interesting StringFunctions (and to a certain extent, even *with* them), I can't really see how it could be done. If we had an actual programming language at our disposal, it would be pretty easy, though.
As for a bug report, that would probably be a good idea, though it's hard to say when it would be fixed. I have a Bugzilla account, so I could post the bug I just need to know your thoughts on the best title and description. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 16:06, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
Since you've them applied those font styles to the "rt" tag, isn't the proceeding "span" tag doing the same thing to the same portion of text? So can't the span be removed, avoiding the problem, or can't those styles be applied to rt all tags by editing the Common.css page?
By plain text do you mean using something like "(闇)[やみ]より(出)[い]でし(絶)[ぜつ](望)[ぼう]" as the input and what's stored as the SMW value? Then CardTable2 and any page which asks for this value will have to use something to format it as "闇(やみ)より出(い)でし絶(ぜつ)望(ぼう)"? I don't really like the idea of needing to apply the formatting to every page that asks for the value. It will mean we'd have to use |template=something in every #ask that that uses |?Ruby Text, which will stop us being able to use the tabular format.
You might also be interested in this suggestion for ruby text. You might remember it from a few years back.
I guess the title of the bug report could be "Factbox creating broken HTML". The description could be Since the middle of long values visible in the factbox are replaced with an ellipsis (...), this can result in broken HTML. For example a value containing "span" tags can have the opening <span> cut out by the ellipsis and the closing </span> left visible. This can cause some skins, such as Monobook to break. I think it's also important that you mention which version of SMW you see the problem on. Maybe the internet browser and site too. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:30, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
After doing some research (mostly reading the original and HTML5 specs; there's a shocking paucity of information elsewhere on the internet, compounded by the fact that the annotation shares its name with a popular programming language (which, even more unfortunately, is widely used for web development, making search results that much harder to correctly distinguish without actually reading them)), I was able to simplify {{Ruby}} to a certain extent, and it doesn't even break SMW now (check the diff I originally linked). I am currently playing with some styles that might let Ruby render in more browsers than just IE/FF-with-extension, based on http://web.nickshanks.com/stylesheets/ruby.css; do you have any idea what stylesheet Dantman was talking about in the linked discussion (in the meantime, the template should be deployable as-is; I just have to see if Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) has the same problems with Ruby output from the template that they were having with raw Ruby code in the page source)? 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:56, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
I think Dantman was planning on writing it himself.
Is Template:Ruby intended to fix the problem Aeris Ventaile is seeing or to simplify the code for adding ruby text? -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:10, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
Its original purpose was to simplify the code, but I'm going to see if I can fix the output of HTML Ruby as well (though, if its output doesn't respond to CSS styling, we'll either have to recommend people not use HTML Ruby in Firefox on this wiki (at least until the pertinent bug is fixed), or change how Template:Ruby works somewhat). 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:38, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

Awesome

Hi, I'm sorta new here but I am familiar with Wikia and I am not an idiot XD. I just wanted to say that you are really good at this editing thing and you're sort of a legend on here. Ooh, I want to be legndary too! XD Ok, that's all, bye. YamiYusei1 (talk • contribs) 02:25, December 2, 2010 (UTC)YamiYusei1

Request

Could you please say a few words to the IP contributor 76.89.243.144? For some reason he has been removing the Unofficial name template from a few card articles lately. A case in point is Naturia Leodrake. --ΜοｎtΕcｈrísＴο９5 15:18, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Ironoid

「アイアン」 "aian" is a common way of translating "iron". Most people (over here in Canada, at least) pronounce "iron" as "ai-ern", which becomes "aiān", which becomes "aian" because people are lazy.

So yeah, "Aianoid" should be "Ironoid". --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 21:23, December 8, 2010 (UTC)

User page

Hi, Could you please delete my User Page? Thanks. 2X☆∞ | GUESS WHO?! IT'S T.S.! 11:37, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Done. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 16:15, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Problem with Machine Emperor

That new user seemed to be an idiot for changing the fourth Emperor into more religious insult name. Why not fixing that page back to normal? --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:19, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Couple things

The Portal:Yu-Gi-Oh! GX (manga) page seems to be categorized under both Portals and Character Portals. It should be removed from the latter category, but I don't see it there when I edit the page. Is there anyway to list the rest of the chapters that have been released in Japan, while still using the English titles for the chapters that do have English equivalents?

Also, I've noticed that several card pages from the latter chapters of the manga seem to have localized page names that aren't official ("Fiendish Trap Hole" and "Vision Polymerization" off the top of my head). Per your comment here, should they be moved to their translated names. Or should we start a community discussion on it? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:07, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, great. Thanks a lot. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:40, December 11, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Can you put the temporary protection thing on the Stardust Dragon/Assault Mode rulings and Lightsworn pages? There is a user continually trying to put up a false ruling saying the SDAM cannot be RFG while its in the Graveyard, and random IP addresses keep putting in staples, random comments, and numbers for suggested cards on the Lightsworn page. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 23:32, December 12, 2010 (UTC)

Can the Gravekeeper's page be locked, or can you please speak to the user "Nobody"? He keeps removing Gravekeeper's Visionary and Solidarity from the page, when they are in fact useful cards to keep listed for people making a basic Keeper deck. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 01:48, December 13, 2010 (UTC)

Crow's friends

It is this image from left to right Taiga (タイガ), Kokoro (ココロ), Ginga (ギンガ), Daichi (ダイチ), and Hikari (ヒカリ). [1]

-- III (talk • contribs) 23:42, December 12, 2010 (UTC)

Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL

You should look at this. Apparently, we're currently in the final season of 5D's. What that is, I don't even... DemonGodAsura (talk • contribs) 09:07, December 13, 2010 (UTC)

Cat's Signature

Do you think that I still not able to create separate article that could cover my signature? Or is that alright now? --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 17:31, December 13, 2010 (UTC)

So, all I do is to put this; {{:User:FredCat100/signature}}, in the place of my screw one should be? --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:33, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
So, you're tell me that he is messing with me? --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:23, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
Understand... I am just to make sure I get it right. Thanks for update my old logbook. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:05, December 14, 2010 (UTC)

Problem with wiki

Hi man! Well someone has posted a message to my talk page by he forgot to sign his post. I'm trying to find it from the "history page" but I don't see that page anywhere. Can you tell me where to see the history of the page?

Also it seems that the new look of Wiki has many other problems too like it has messed up the names of the cards (by replacing them with an un-existing link), shortened the pages by placing 2 large brown spaces on the left and right side of the page, and more. To tell you the truth I kinda missed the old-look style! Q_Q

Thanks! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:30, December 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot man! That "MonoBook" is what I was looking for. :) ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 00:25, December 15, 2010 (UTC)

The Thread I recently moved.

I'm not sure if I moved it correctly. I tried to move it to the Ruling Queries of the Forums. If I did it incorrectly could you fix it for me, and in the future how would I move a Thread to a Section of the Forums?Altyrell (talk • contribs) 21:51, December 15, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Altyrell (talk • contribs) 04:12, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Unregister User comments in my Talk Page

Please check out the latest post in my Talk Page if you can. He sound little upset that I changed the point of view about "Phoenix Mode" of The Winged Dragon of Ra... He also linked me to fake site (Pojo) for further evidence. I ever respond back, but just to let you know what's going on. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 03:09, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

That user sound more "pissed-off" about me being against the ruling. Little help please? He still believe that "Tournament-Ruling" legal are better than the "crap" that we are building and posting. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 03:22, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Anger User Issue

Check it out! He seemed mad that I rejected his objection against the delete notice about that Card Tip. I am sure you can flip him over to right path. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:55, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Gotcha, and he tell me off with other user, which I am not sure if he is an admin, about me being disagreed with him. He should learn to behaving better. You can do whatever you like for now. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:28, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

I am not angry with him, it is just that I followed ALL of the procedures for expressing my opinion on a PROPOSED deletion as per the instructions under said policy.

He keeps deleting my opinion. he removes the discussion link from the page and I will not have my opinion censored. I was polite and succinct. There was no reason to delete my opinion on the matter.

Question: One of his reasons said ("TALK: Card Tip:Three Yadda" is what it should be. Now shut the f-k up!). Is he talking about possibly the name being wrong? if anything he is the one with anger problems. As per his last section of comment. I am just going to keep adding the discussion link back and restating the original opinion I gave regarding the ORIGINAL deletion. and the reason he gave for it. Glittersword 23:03, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

The reality reason he done wrong is that it's such to be Card Tips Talk:Three Step Opposition of the Six, not Card Tips:Three Step Opposition of the Six. He put "Discussion" infobox there instead. That's why I kept erasing it off from the Card Tip. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:11, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I do not see any instructions to "create" the page you speak of in the Deletion notice window. I followed those instructions to the letter. QUOTE: (If this page does not exist or the template is not in page, please add this tag to the top of the page: discussion). That is EXACTLY what I did. If that is not accurate then the notice needs to be clarified. Glittersword 23:27, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

The part before that is: "Please share your thoughts on the matter on the discussion page. "
It's referring to Card Tips talk:Three Step Opposition of the Six
The page does exist, so you don't add anything. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 23:33, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Falzar for making a point. That's why I destroyed it from Original Card Tips. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:35, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

OK, that is fine, if I missed that, I missed it. However that doesn't give him the right to delete my original opinion which seems to be on the right page, however it got there. (BTW: I am NOT angry. However, what I am is STUBBORN. Glittersword 23:50, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, what's stubborn's emotion look like? Take a look at the mirror and tell us what you saw. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:54, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Stubborn is not an emotion, it is an attitude, a way you approach things. I did not once lose my temper with you, I did not resort to crude language (Even if a letter was replaced by a dash). I did not resort to insulting my adversary. I just kept on doing what I was doing and was willing to see who tired of it first. We could have gone into 2012 before I would even begin to get tired of putting my opinion back up. I have a "Don Quixote" personality and you were perfectly willing to be my windmill. Glittersword 22:43, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

(Sun, Dec 19 2010)

you deleted an official ruling of MST

"Mystical Space Typhoon does not actually "negate" a Spell or Trap Card. You can chain any Spell or Trap Card activation with Mystical Space Typhoon, destroying it. The destruction of the card does not negate its effects. However, depending on the type of Spell or Trap card, it can prevent its effect from taking place. Continuous, Equip, and Field Spell Cards are the only Spell cards that will have their effects stopped if they are chained with Mystical Space Typhoon. The same rulings apply to Continuous Trap Cards. As long as you chain to the activation of the Spell or Trap Card with Mystical Space Typhoon and target it, when the chain resolves the Spell or Trap Card's effect will disappear. "

Should be on there to kill any questions on whether it negates or not. Yes its common knowledge but some new players do not know this —This unsigned comment was made by Sephirothx12 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Next time, please tap ~ four times, as it will magical put your user name and date when you completed "save page" it. And Delta also said that it's unofficial and card "8" is not exist. So be careful of what you're trying to place on. Ever "Mirror Force" still resolved though if it's destroyed by cute MST. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:04, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
This may be true which is covered in that text "The destruction of the card does not negate its effects. However, depending on the type of Spell or Trap card, it can prevent its effect from taking place. Continuous, Equip, and Field Spell Cards are the only Spell cards that will have their effects stopped if they are chained with Mystical Space Typhoon." it may be unoffical but ask any judge and they will tell you exactly that Sephirothx12 (talk • contribs) 23:13, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Making sense. If you still want it to be on the site, please put that in your own "Judge Page" under your user name. Like I have all over in my signature right now. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:27, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
I am aware that "Mystical Space Typhoon" does not negate effects. You listed that as appearing in the rulings for a card called "8". As FredCat said it was removed because "8" does not exist and the ruling was unofficial. While it was true, we only post the official card rulings that Konami or UDE have directly issued. These are the ones posted in the "card rulings" section of the Konami website and previously the UDE website. OCG rulings are taken from the Japanese Konami FAQ site. The page I linked to covers the established standards.
The ruling about Continuous Cards having their effects prevented is listed in the OCG section, because it was posted here. If we were to post the ruling on "Mystical Space Typhoon" not negating it would have to also have been posted on one of those sites. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:42, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
After looking through the Japanese site, this rulings has been posted here, so I've added it to the OCG rulings section. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:05, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Storm of Ragnarok

Hi, a long time yu-gi-oh fan here (though I didn't really like GX, but I like the tuner-concepts of 5Ds)! I recently saw the Storm of Ragnarok, and I wondered when it's going to come out. It looks very awesome, looks able to stand up to the strongest zombies and/or dragons, so I wonder when I could buy a pack or two. Thanks for your time, --Sir_REX Strikes Back 03:33, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to bit your head...

But I just wanna show you this error; PoD Talk Page. --FredCat Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:19, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Cyber archetype

Seeing as "Emergency Cyber" is a support card, shouldn't be count "Cybers" as an actual archetype, with "Cyber Dragons" as a sub-archetype? We have the Cyber Style page. Would be a good bet to move "Cyber Style" to "Cybers" and make that the archetype page? It seems redundant to have both pages, and I think we need an archetype page for this. Let me know what you think and I'll start working on it. I didn't expect much interest in the topic on the forum, so I figured I'd just ask you.

Also, there seems to be an issue with some of the VG deck parameters in the character infobox. The deck names were previously visible and now are not, though they still appear when editing the article. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 06:00, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I'll figure something out with it then. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:37, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
I created the page and adapted Template:Cyber based on Template:Hero. What I don't know how to do is create another section on the Cyber template for cards that are in the "Cyber" archetype, but not in one of the three sub-archetypes. If you can let me know how to do that, I'll start editing the card articles to include the archetype. I don't play the TCG anymore, so it would be a better bet for someone else to come along and write the sections about play style and such. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:27, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Ryoga

Yes it was confirmed, there was a trailer released today which showed him summoning a giant fish against Yuma. Also within the clip, it showed his name as being Ayer Shark on the duel score board. —This unsigned comment was made by TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://yugipedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Deltaneos/Archive_36&oldid=1731628"