Talk:Stardust Overdrive

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Stardust Overdrive.
This page is for discussing how to improve the page. For general discussion and comments, use the general discussion forum. To ask about rulings or how cards work, use the ruling queries forum. To get help with building a Deck, use the Deck help forum. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

TCG Exclusives

1. SOVR-EN08? Koa'ki Meiru ??
2. SOVR-EN08? Koa'ki Meiru ??
3. SOVR-EN08? Six Samurai card
4. SOVR-EN08? ??, Lightsworn ??
5. SOVR-EN08? ??, Lightsworn ??
6. SOVR-EN08? Fish-Type card
7. SOVR-EN08? Earthbound Immortal card

Where do people get the information for all the TCG exclusive cards for this set?

It hasn't even been released in Japan yet.

Can we see proof, or this should be removed.

It's been confirmed here is that enough proof for you? --Trivi-AM 15:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

English Stardust Overdrive Pack

How could they have an English image of the Stardust Overdrive pack? For one thing, the picture says "12 Cards per pack" if you look close enough. Plus, the new 5D's pack always are first released as 1st Edition. This image HAS to be fake! --Narutoheroes12 15:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I think the TCG release date is wrong

How could it be released in Nov. 2009 if we're getting Ancient Prophecy in September? Nov. 2010 doesn't work either because it's too much of a time lapse (usually, they're released every 6 months). Bobcorncob 03:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Where did the November information come from? According to shriektg, we only know it would out in 2009. I hope It can be out in December 2009. --Blackwings0605 04:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

They are released every about three months. Messengerofthedark 04:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Messengerofthedark

when is the bosster pack comming out in the u.s.a?

this pack probably won't be out until December of 2009. A three month span between packs would place it's sneak peak about late November. Vehicroidsrage 05:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

To be acurate they havnt really given a specific date, just thats on this year so for now its better to erase that on november until its officaly announced info on this booster. DracoX 20:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

cardlist up by now?

certain parts of singapore released it early. i saw the booster pack today. shouldn't the cardlist be up by now? -Lpoi 11:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Was that the English or Asian-English set? -- Deltaneos (talk) 11:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Japan -Lpoi 13:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

I should change "Majestic Star Dragon" → "Savior Star Dragon".

User:Modo assalto is vandalism - "Savior Star Dragon" → "Majestic Star Dragon".

Can you agree that user's action?

confirmed Majestic Star Dragon and click here! to confirm!!! --Modo assalto 15:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

I can't believe bacause it dosen't appear the real thing. I wish I were that one.

• uh... Modo, recheck that link cause that link goes to Ancient Prophecy and i looked that the Stardust Overdrive Shriek has and nothing has changed on it...~MEOW~ Might of the BIRD Empire~~ 17:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

• Where is the proof?~MEOW~ Might of the BIRD Empire~~ 00:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

• Check here. It will be in the second waves of the 2009 tins as well, I guess. Messengerofthedark 02:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

• Yeah i saw that and now i shut up~MEOW~ Might of the BIRD Empire~~ 03:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Salvation Dragon - Savior Dragon

Do we actually have any confirmation on the name simply changing to "Majestic Dragon"? Burnpsy 20:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Possible Sneak Peak / Release Date

At the Konami table at GenCon they had these packs under glass with a card that said "Available September 22, 2009" I don't know if that would be the release date or the sneak date, but I'm pretty sure that packs will become available around then24.100.25.239 19:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

i believe they will do the same sort of thing with this as they did with ancient prophecy (release a tin or 2 with some pre-release boosters and release the main booster later as unlimited edition. and i do not believe the stardust overdrive sneak peek will be so close to the release of ancient prophecy - id guess either november or latest december Sonic0chick0ames 21:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

isaw these pictures in the official yugioh site too with the jack atlas tin and sd17 and stardust overdrive and overdrive se anpr and anpr-se Sartorias 21:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

you got a link? Sonic0chick0ames 21:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Here is it:

http://pojo.com/yu-gi-oh/News/2009/GenConReport2009.shtml

63.151.141.9 12:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

wow your're right :D - i WANT this set and also the luna/leo etc tins look ace and same with the earthbound tin - i reali cant wait if this is 100% true - 2 sets in 1 month - it'll be one of the best months for the tcg Sonic0chick0ames 15:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

All 3 Yu-Gi-Oh! Series in Stardust Overdrive

I found this on Ideal808 that I don't know if anyone saw yet. It might give hints as to the OCG cards being added to the set: http://ideal808.com/sideads/konami_yugioh_stardust.jpg --Narutoheroes12 19:13, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

English Names???

Speaking of which, where are all these new English names like "Stardust Xialong", "Level Stealer" and others coming from? I never saw the list get updated.--Narutoheroes12 23:26, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Gladiator Beast Gauls

Who is Gladiator Beast Gauls? --Narutoheroes12 01:37, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

someone has a link to some monstre Gladiator Beast Gauls in Stardust Overdrive??--Modo assalto 01:43, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

first off what the hell? second why would there be a gb tuner but no synchro? and third there would most likly be an article on it already if it did exist just sayin'.--Berfomet 00:42, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

TCG List

Before everyone starts blowing their tops off about how "It's on Shriek", this list has no basis, no source and pretty much nothing going for it. If you're going to re-post it, do it with an actual justification. 3-D 23:27, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

What's wrong with Shriek? We use them as a source for like every upcoming set. They're not known for making stuff up. I know we're ignoring them for "Koa'ki Meiru Beetle's" effect, but they've acknowledged that they themselves haven't fully confirmed that that's right. If they're not positive that this list is right, urely they would have mentioned that it's unconfirmed too. I don't know where they got the list for this set, but they've gotten the correct list in advance for all the previous TCG sets they've posted prior to their release... Unless I'm mistaken? -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:53, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

Except I haven't heard anything confirming this. I never Shriek was bad, just every time something is posted on there, it goes like wildfire through the Yu-Gi-Oh! community and it's hella annoying having to revert and correct every single person when it's not true. Shriek is a blog, nothing more, nothing less, and blogs tend not to be a stalwart source, and especially not something a encyclopedia should be referring to. 3-D 00:00, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

It will spread like wildfire no matter what you do. People believe them, they haven't been wrong yet, as Deltaneos stated, and you're one person who's complaining. Just one. You shouldn't be able to overrule everyone who beleives those with a high success rate. Burnpsy 02:07, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Oh, people do complain about Shriek, I just happen to be the only one the Wikia ;).

Let's get this straight. Shriek is a news blog, not some sort of Yu-Gi-Oh! insider. He finds upcoming YGO products and compiles onto one list. Now, no one can check all their sources, but I know for a fact this popped up on Pojo one day by a lesser known member who has little to no background and credibility with no source. And, quite frankly, I haven't seen spoilers done in this manner since ever. 3-D 02:30, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

While you have no proof that the Pojo member didn't receive this info from the same source, and have no proof that Shriek doesn't have connections within Konami, there's another thing I should point out on top of those points that I just mentioned (that pretty much invalidate the important parts of your message). Most of the articles around the cards with their name changed have already been edited. It's more work to revert them now only to find out that YOU were wrong (if that turns out to be the case) and put them back then it is to just leave them be. With that logic, you should leave all Shriek data alone.

Also, if these other people aren't on the Wikia, why do we care? Burnpsy 23:21, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Inversely, you have no way to prove Shriek got them through a method other than looking at various forums. In any case, there's nothing to prove whether this real or false; it's a just a list, nothing else to go with it. No pictures, no source. If you can provide with me something else; then by all means do it. And don't say Shriek is never wrong, because then you're saying you've never seen the bogus nationals decklists. 3-D 23:34, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Where did all of the English cards went to? There IS a link for all of them on Shriek TCG. See? http://shriektcg.twoday.net/stories/5924510/ --Narutoheroes12 01:01, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

You know, all of the arguments I've encountered up until now have all hinged upon the fact that "Shriek is always right". It's not. It has spread a fair few falsities in it time. 3-D 01:07, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

i'm probably going to regret this *puts on heat shields* But, couldn't we include Shriek's list BUT put a "*" next to them and include a note that states something like "Unofficially Confirmed" or something along those lines?~MEOW~ Might of the BIRD Empire~~ 02:08, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Well that means anything could go up, so longs as its posed as a spoiler and gets the right exposure (e.g. Shriek). Shreik has never confirmed anything, it just posts news (albeit slight hastily). 3-D 02:28, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

What's with this sudden problem you have with Shriek that you have all of a sudden he is the main (if not only) up-to-date source of TCG releases and information. While I can see the point you're making of he just looks around the internet and copies whatever he sees, but he hasn't been incorrect with anything he's posted recently. You didn't care about the RGBT and ANPR spoiler which we got from HIS website. So why are you suddenly having any problems now? On another note, he also runs the OCG website and posts the information about OCG releases there, so by logic you don't believe that website either. --Trivi-AM 10:32, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

I know what to trust on Shriek's website because I go look around and do a little bit of research. I look for magazine scans, pictures, photos, background information etc. This really hasn't got any of that, and I have yet to see anything otherwise. 3-D 10:36, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

ok 3D, how about the Shining Darkness and the Blackfeather Dragon? do you agree that they should be on here, or should they be taken down? I'm just wondering why it's a double standard? Also if we aren't going to use Shriek's site, then why do we use the other. And if we aren't to use them as "fact" why do we use them as References?~MEOW~ Might of the BIRD Empire~~ 20:23, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

But those have actual sources to go by (Magazine Scan). This is what I'm trying to get here; this has none of that here. It's a list from nowhere. I'm not saying "It's on Shriek, so it's bad", but until the time you have solid evidence, it's just something on Shriek, a news blog, not a confirmation site. 3-D 20:33, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Is the Pojo member you are talking about Dimitri? He's the one Shriek got the list from. Looking further down that forum he says he's not authorised to give his source. >_> -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:55, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Shriek has over and over and over again proved itself to be a goldmine of usefull information and its where a majority of this wikis info comes from along with other source but this has already been said--Kazisaki 21:19, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Stardust Overdrive came out, and whaddya know? Shriek was right. Now get outta here before the mods start to like this page, 3-D.--Cross Drago 03:22, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Rarities?

Where did the rarities for the TCG come from?? --Narutoheroes12 12:15, October 21, 2009 (UTC)